While I really need to get a rifle rest to eliminate shooter error, I think I found the sweet spot my rifle likes to spit.
The loads I tested, 24, 24.2, 24.4 and 24.5 grains. If I ignore the couple of shots that were far in between (4 out of 10 shots on a bipod) and look at the ones that had a grouping, the 24.2 and 24.4 gave better results than the other loads.

Test were done at a 100 yards on a 16" chrome lined middy.
Used H335, Tula KVB223M primers used LC brass, length 1755" COAL 2227-2250" and generic 62 grain solid lead core bullets from Everglades.
So the question is, should I continue developing loads till I reach the recommended max? or should I just settle for 24.2 or 24.4? )though I did load a new batch of 24.3, .6 and .7 last night)
Would there be another sweet spot with higher loads?
I dont have a chrono, and I'm just thinking that maybe more powder would mean more velocity (for longer distance)?
Hodgdon's online data shows 63 grains max at 25 while Lyman's 39th has the 63 max at 26.4 grains and 25.8 for the 60 grains.
The loads I tested, 24, 24.2, 24.4 and 24.5 grains. If I ignore the couple of shots that were far in between (4 out of 10 shots on a bipod) and look at the ones that had a grouping, the 24.2 and 24.4 gave better results than the other loads.

Test were done at a 100 yards on a 16" chrome lined middy.
Used H335, Tula KVB223M primers used LC brass, length 1755" COAL 2227-2250" and generic 62 grain solid lead core bullets from Everglades.
So the question is, should I continue developing loads till I reach the recommended max? or should I just settle for 24.2 or 24.4? )though I did load a new batch of 24.3, .6 and .7 last night)
Would there be another sweet spot with higher loads?
I dont have a chrono, and I'm just thinking that maybe more powder would mean more velocity (for longer distance)?
Hodgdon's online data shows 63 grains max at 25 while Lyman's 39th has the 63 max at 26.4 grains and 25.8 for the 60 grains.

Comment