Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Low 223 velocity.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mkga14
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 23

    Low 223 velocity.

    Good evening Calgunners!

    With my recent purchase of a chrony... I have more questions!

    ATM I am shooting my reloads through a 14.5 inch 1x7 twist barrel. Reloads are made from once fired LC brass mixed with some PMC 223 pick ups. Sized and trimmed to spec, loaded with 22.7 gr of H335 shooting a 55 gr Hornady FMJ-BT w/c.

    I set my chrony about 10 feet away, like the instructions says, shot about 30 rds through it and i'm seeing an average of 2430-2460 fps. In the Hornady reloading manual, it lists 22.5 gr of H335 at 2500 fps.

    At the moment I'm just paper punching and attempting to hit some steel targets at 600 and below. So the low fps isn't that big of a deal to me. I've seen around 3100 fps out of factory XM193 rounds. My question is... How can I get that far if the max in the Hornady manual is listed at 23.5 gr at 2600 fps?

    I realize factory XM193 rounds don't use H335. Has anyone loaded H335 up to 3100 fps? If I ever wanted to load up to that, should I just keep adding powder in .1/.2 increments until I see signs of over pressure? Ejector snare, popped primers and craters. Seems a bit dangerous to me but I'm stupid enough to try!

    On a side note, the manual also shows 23.2 gr of H335 at 3100 fps BUT that's out of a 26" 1x12 twist barrel.

    Sorry for the newb question, and thanks in advance!
  • #2
    bohoki
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jan 2006
    • 20825

    i doubt you could ever get 3100 with only 23.2

    Comment

    • #3
      rsrocket1
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 2768

      600 yards with a 14.5" barrel?
      With a 2500 fps MV, you'll need a 163" hold over. My typical load is 25.0g H335 which gets me ~3000-3030 fps out of a 20" AR

      I would not exceed the recommended max load. A 3100 fps 26" MV translates to a MV of 2800 fps with a 14.5" barrel.

      Comment

      • #4
        mkga14
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 23

        Yeah no wonder why I could never hit those. Best I could ever do were the 300s =]

        Well, if I could only get 2800 fps out of the max load... then I'll settle for that! Or buy more xm193 but that would defeat the purpose of reloading!

        Thanks for your help!

        Comment

        • #5
          ptmn
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 789

          Comment

          • #6
            rsrocket1
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 2768

            Just think about it, your 14.5" is made for close quarters combat, not exchanging sniper fire from hilltop to hilltop.

            If you want long range at least go with a heavier bullet. A 75g bullet might only be loaded to about 21g of H335 and will have a MV of 2450 fps but will drop only 120" @ 600 yards. Heavier bullets will drop less than light ones when you get into those long distances. They are also less prone to wind drift.

            Comment

            • #7
              mkga14
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 23

              Hmmm, you're right. I should be happy with hitting the 300 plates. Perhaps a longer barrel/upper will do. Thanks again.

              Comment

              • #8
                mif_slim
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Apr 2008
                • 10089

                Jist remember that the books mostly will publish loads with its optimum ability. Most will be 24-26" barrel for .223/5.56. These numbers gets new reloaders excited until they get results and its not the same.

                2450Fps is just right. I get about 2535fps with my 16" and 2900 with my 24".
                Originally posted by Gottmituns
                It's not protecting the rights of the 1%, it's IMPOSING new laws because of the 1%.

                Comment

                • #9
                  tiller
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 794

                  Your way under minimum... Ithink the hornady book is 23.5 grains min...

                  I use 24.5 for a plinking round
                  .223 & .308 brass processing

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bigdawg86
                    Veteran Member
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 3554

                    It's hard to see a blazing hot FPS but not be able to reproduce it... I was averaging 2975+/- FPS with my 16" barrel / 55g FMJ and it was killing me not to hit 3000.

                    I laughed when I was seeing 24" barrel lengths used with certain powder website data.
                    With a barrel that big you might as well be jousting your opponent on a horse.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      2shotjoe
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 26564



                      book says 22.3grs with a 26" barrel, you'll lose about 50 fps per inch?
                      Last edited by 2shotjoe; 12-03-2012, 9:41 PM.
                      Originally posted by Kestryll
                      ..you're kind of a sad excuse for an attorney...
                      Originally posted by Libertarian777
                      ...Don't pick either side....

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        CGT80
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 2981

                        23.2 of H-335 gives me 2949 fps average and a high of 3041 fps. This is the most accurate load I have tried in my Mini 14 Target model that is chambered for 223 Rem. and has a 1:9 twist and 22" barrel.

                        24.0 grains of H-335 gives 3011 fps average and 3106 fps high. This load doesn't group as well as the lighter one.

                        I use a berrys/hornady 55 fmjbt and mixed brass. Other people with shorter, 5.56 chambered, AR15's report lower velocities than what I got as well.
                        He who dies with the most tools/toys wins

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Wrangler John
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 1799

                          Your rifle has a 1/2" shorter barrel than my Contender pistol in .223 Remington. That's all the velocity it's going to produce.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Trash
                            Junior Member
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 26

                            Originally posted by rsrocket1
                            A 75g bullet might only be loaded to about 21g of H335 and will have a MV of 2450 fps but will drop only 120" @ 600 yards. Heavier bullets will drop less than light ones when you get into those long distances.
                            I think what you meant to was that heavier bullets are more stable and predictable at long ranges. Drop is a function of time of flight and NOT bullet weight. A slower bullet will drop more over a given distance than a faster one.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              GeoffLinder
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 2425

                              Originally posted by Trash
                              I think what you meant to was that heavier bullets are more stable and predictable at long ranges. Drop is a function of time of flight and NOT bullet weight. A slower bullet will drop more over a given distance than a faster one.
                              This ^^

                              The reason for using heavier bullets is lower drag so less drop percentage is realized than lighter bullets (not less drop overall, just less of a percentage than lighter with velocity difference factored). Lower drag and VLD profile also contribute to less wind drift.
                              Last edited by GeoffLinder; 12-05-2012, 8:56 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1