Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

question about .380 loads...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mzimmers
    Senior Member
    • May 2006
    • 1526

    question about .380 loads...

    ...hi, guys. Someone just asked a question of me that I don't have enough expertise for. Can anyone help to either confirm his concerns, or put his mind at ease?



    Feel free to either post the reply here, or on ScopedIn.

    Thanks...
    M. Zimmers
    Born-again Californian (for better or worse)
  • #2
    pdq_wizzard
    Veteran Member
    • May 2008
    • 3813

    I don't reload 380 but I would say that is on the very high side for a 95gr lead bullet, looking at what Alliant says for there 380 load with Bullseye

    Bullseye 3.4 @ 981fps (and they recomend working up to this load)

    if it were me I would have started at 3.2 and work up to something I like to shot (10 rounds at a time)

    most load data that I have shows max vel for 95gr FMJ bullets @ 953fps so I would keep lead at or under 800fps

    just my .02
    Q: What was the most positive result of the "Cash for Clunkers" program?
    A: It took 95% of the Obama bumper stickers off the road.

    Originally posted by M. Sage
    More what? More crazy?
    You live in California. There's always more crazy. It's a renewable resource.

    Comment

    • #3
      longhairchris
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 318

      I would agree, sounds too hot for .380. Would be ok for 9mm Luger though. The guy said he loaded 1000 rounds?!? Without testing some first? Tell the guy to buy a reloading manual and read it if he hasn't done so already.

      My pet load in .380 is a 102gr cast boolit over 2.5 gr titegroup.

      Comment

      • #4
        gotsig
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 568

        I load 95gr LRN over 3.0gr of 231 @.980oal. Lyman's data for 90gr(#2 alloy) is 2.4-3.0gr of bullseye @.980oal. My Speer manual doesn't list a lead load. If it was me, I'd pull em and work up from 2.6gr @ .980oal
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #5
          pdq_wizzard
          Veteran Member
          • May 2008
          • 3813

          After looking at some more data I agree with starting around 2.6 looks like 3.2 would still be close to 900fps


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Q: What was the most positive result of the "Cash for Clunkers" program?
          A: It took 95% of the Obama bumper stickers off the road.

          Originally posted by M. Sage
          More what? More crazy?
          You live in California. There's always more crazy. It's a renewable resource.

          Comment

          • #6
            mzimmers
            Senior Member
            • May 2006
            • 1526

            Thanks for the input, guys. The man asking the question did say that his bullets are Brinell 18 hardness, so they can probably take a fair load. The bigger question to me is, whether the gun can handle it.

            Hopefully, he'll read my response to him and re-do those loads.
            M. Zimmers
            Born-again Californian (for better or worse)

            Comment

            • #7
              noylj
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2010
              • 713

              As I posted at ScopedIn, the COL alone tells you that it must be a 9x19 load.
              The manuals minimum COL for .380 Auto is generally 0.975-0.980 and NOT 1-inch or more.
              Also, the 9x19 load for 95gn L-RN is:
              9x19
              Bullet Weight Powder Weight Velocity Start/Max
              Cast Lead 95 Bullseye 4.0 1125 Start
              Cast Lead 95 Bullseye 5.0 1290 Max

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1