Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

.45 ACP FMJ Load vs TMJ Load

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marathonman
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 169

    .45 ACP FMJ Load vs TMJ Load

    My Speer Manual #14 says to use 5.6 grs start to 6.2 grs maximum for .45 TMJ RN.

    Hodgon's online database says use 4.2grs min to 5.3 grs max for 230 GR. HDY FMJ FP

    I'm surprised by the large range.

    I have HDY FMJ RN (not FP) 230 grain - I was planning on starting with 4.2 and working up, but according to the Speer TMJ I should start with 5.6.

    Any ideas?

    Thanks
  • #2
    iareConfusE
    Veteran Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4464

    What powder? Might help us to know what powder you're using...

    I would probably start with the lower charge and work your way up. Just make small batches of different charge weights, increasing to the max load. 10 rounds of each charge weight should suffice and give you an idea of accuracy/recoil that you're looking for.

    Right now I've been loading 200gr Ranier plated over 4.9gr of Titegroup.

    Comment

    • #3
      Oceanbob
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jun 2010
      • 12720

      I'am guessing

      231..?

      And my Lyman 49th says for 231 to use 5.2 to 5.8 max.

      Start in the middle somewhere and work it up.

      Just stay below the MAX for 231 on all three sources.

      I've found that some of these online recipes sites are really not accurate at all. I suspect they purposely bump the numbers down for liability reasons.

      Just my opinion, your mileage may vary.

      *It helps to have some older reloading manuals. But be aware that formulas for the same powder (Unique for example) are DIFFERENT than they were 15 years ago. Serious stuff.
      May the Bridges I burn light the way.

      Life Is Not About Waiting For The Storm To Pass - Its About Learning To Dance In The Rain.

      Fewer people are killed with all rifles each year (323 in 2011) than with shotguns (356), hammers and clubs (496), and hands and feet (728).

      Comment

      • #4
        gadjeep
        Senior Member
        • May 2009
        • 1942

        There's quite a lot of important info missing from your question. Powder types, weight of tmj bullet, etc.

        The rule of thumb I've frequently heard is: if You don't have a specific load for the tmj projectile you are using, you
        STUFF I HAVE FOR SALE! SCOPE RINGS, Man CAVE FRIDGE, ETC
        http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...30#post7299330
        http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=487541

        STUFF I WANT TO BUY! Glock 20, Marlin model 39

        Comment

        • #5
          gadjeep
          Senior Member
          • May 2009
          • 1942

          First and foremost, there us a big difference between fmj and tmj. Fmj has a copper jacket around a lead core. Tmj is a sized, cast lead bullet that has been electrically / chemically plated with an extremely thin copper coating similar to 22lr bullets. They reduce leading compared to pure lead but are not as tough (or expensive ) as fmj/ball bullets.

          There's quite a lot of important info missing from your question. Powder types, weight of tmj bullet, etc.

          The rule of thumb I've frequently heard is: if You don't have a specific load for the tmj projectile you are using, you should start at a similar shape and weight cast lead load.

          That being said, You should be
          STUFF I HAVE FOR SALE! SCOPE RINGS, Man CAVE FRIDGE, ETC
          http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...30#post7299330
          http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=487541

          STUFF I WANT TO BUY! Glock 20, Marlin model 39

          Comment

          • #6
            marathonman
            Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 169

            Originally posted by gadjeep
            There's quite a lot of important info missing from your question. Powder types, weight of tmj bullet, etc.

            The rule of thumb I've frequently heard is: if You don't have a specific load for the tmj projectile you are using, you
            Sorry guys - Both are 230 grain bullets and Winchester 231
            Last edited by marathonman; 01-25-2011, 10:01 AM. Reason: typo

            Comment

            • #7
              rsrocket1
              Veteran Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 2768

              TMJ's are quite a bit softer than FMJ's so since you are using FMJ's, you should be starting your loads according to the FMJ chart, not the TMJ one.

              The geometry of the point doesn't matter so much as whether it is plated, bare lead or jacketed. You are using jacketed so use the 4.2-5.3 recommendation.

              Comment

              • #8
                bohoki
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2006
                • 20815

                fmj hard copper on soft lead
                tmj soft copper on hard lead

                Comment

                • #9
                  smalltime
                  Member
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 208

                  Hodgdon's data has OAL at 1.20" which is pretty short for a round nose. Lyman 49th book for the Speer TMJ RN 230gr lists 1.275" OAL and 5.2 - 5.8 gr Win. 231

                  I've loaded 1k berry's plated at 1.250-1.265 with no problems but never used 231 only bullseye and WST. Now I have a bunch of zero FMJ's loaded to test this weekend. They are cheaper than plated.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    elcordobes
                    Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 290

                    Always start low and work your way up. Look for signs of excess pressure as you progress. Remember you are not loading for pressure in the abstract but pressure in your gun. Some of the loading manuals are extremely conservative depending on the cartridge and the type of guns it has been chambered for. The .45 has been around for a long time and there are guns from before 1911 chambered for it. The loading data is probably very conservative. Then again if your gun has a tight chamber, even some of the listed loads may produce too much pressure.

                    What you are trying to find is the most accurate load at a safe pressure.
                    Fighting the bull 24/7

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1