I am starting to work on reduced loads for my .44/240gr SWC and wanted to make sure I didn't make a big Kaboom mistake.
I was reading in the Lee book on his rules of thumb on determining proper reduced loads for cast lead by using strength of materials versus pressures.
In his book (kind of out of left field) he cautions against reducing loads less than 80% of start loads when using slow burning powders. In that section he has a list of powders running from 50 BMG (slowest) to vv-N310 & Bullseye (fastest) and says you can reduce safely an additional 1% percent (from 20%) more from start loads for every step up in burn speed you go.
I was trying to figure out how this related to some recent posts by guys whose knowledge in this field I really respect on fast burning powders under heavy bullets causing an over pressure situation. I sensed it was two different concerns but couldn't reconcile the two concerns.
If the Lee book is correct, then it seems if I stick to the faster powders, reducing 50% or more from start loads (of the published .44 Mag start loads) should be no problem. Reading some recent posts by knowledgable guys on these threads, I am not so sure.
Way back in the past when I was loading for rifles, I had read about how reduced charges can cause "shaped charge" effects and all sorts of other way out stuff, but never read anything that seemed to jive with my limited knowledge of physics on the subject.
Any real world experience would be greatly appreciated.
I was reading in the Lee book on his rules of thumb on determining proper reduced loads for cast lead by using strength of materials versus pressures.
In his book (kind of out of left field) he cautions against reducing loads less than 80% of start loads when using slow burning powders. In that section he has a list of powders running from 50 BMG (slowest) to vv-N310 & Bullseye (fastest) and says you can reduce safely an additional 1% percent (from 20%) more from start loads for every step up in burn speed you go.
I was trying to figure out how this related to some recent posts by guys whose knowledge in this field I really respect on fast burning powders under heavy bullets causing an over pressure situation. I sensed it was two different concerns but couldn't reconcile the two concerns.
If the Lee book is correct, then it seems if I stick to the faster powders, reducing 50% or more from start loads (of the published .44 Mag start loads) should be no problem. Reading some recent posts by knowledgable guys on these threads, I am not so sure.
Way back in the past when I was loading for rifles, I had read about how reduced charges can cause "shaped charge" effects and all sorts of other way out stuff, but never read anything that seemed to jive with my limited knowledge of physics on the subject.
Any real world experience would be greatly appreciated.


Comment