LC vs. Win. Brass .223

[hylander]

So I got some New LC .223 dated 09 with Nato Star
Desided to do alittle compairision with my New Winchester Brass.
These are averages:
Weight:
LC = 92.68
Win. = 94.5
Deviation was less with the LC
Primer Prockets Diameter
LC = .173
Win. = .1735
Primer Procket Depth
LC = .1205
Win = .1175
Case Neck wall Thickness
LC = .012
Win. = .0125

I found these findings odd, seeing how everyone keeps telling me LC is suppose to be thicker and hold less Volume, my findings are just the opposite.
Only thing better with LC is the Cases are Annealed and Primer Pockets
are .0005 tighter and .003 deeper.
Also weight Deviation was less with the LC Brass

[FLIGHT762]

Military 5.56 brass and commercial .223 Remington brass are very close to one another in weight.

I believe where a lot of people get confused is Military 7.62 NATO brass is thicker than it's commercial, .308 Winchester counterpart.

Here's a good article that shows some of the commercial .223 Rem. compared to Military 5.56 brass:

http://www.6mmbr.com/223Rem.html

[hylander]

Military 5.56 brass and commercial .223 Remington brass are very close to one another in weight.

I believe where a lot of people get confused is Military 7.62 NATO brass is thicker than it's commercial, .308 Winchester counterpart.

Here's a good article that shows some of the commercial .223 Rem. compared to Military 5.56 brass:

http://www.6mmbr.com/223Rem.html

Well that figures, I never bought .556 LC Brass before.
I figured it would be better than the Win Brass, but I recken not