Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Over Pressure or no?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SixPointEight
    Veteran Member
    • May 2009
    • 3788

    Over Pressure or no?

    I loaded some LC brass with 55gr Hornady SP bullets @ 2.200" COL. Loaded it with 1.6cc of AA2230 which is about 23.1gr, same load I use in my PMC plinking ammo with no worries. Manual lists 22.5gr-25.0gr as the loads. However, I let of 10 rounds, and on 4 of them I get what appears to be ejector smear. However...the primers aren't flattened, they aren't cratered, not flowing, backing out or blowing out gas. Then to top it off, the necks are a bit sooty like the round is under pressure.

    Gun is a CMMG Carbine Upper with approximately 400-500 rounds through it. I have heard new guns can smear brass that's loaded within spec, but why only on some rounds? Could this be a false sign caused by marking it with the nail polish on the primer? I don't see how, but stranger things happen. Should I let the other 25 rounds loose and watch for more of them to smear? Looking through the brass, 2 unfired cases also have some minor smearing on them. Could it just be that these 4 had it before and I missed it, possibly.

    Sorry about the dark pic, cell phone is best camera I have.
  • #2
    Nessal
    Banned
    • Jan 2009
    • 2261

    Am i reading that correctly? Your oal is 2.200? Book spec lists 2.250. That would def raise your pressure.

    Comment

    • #3
      SixPointEight
      Veteran Member
      • May 2009
      • 3788

      Cannelure and bullet manufacturer reccomend 2.200 COL. And I worked up to 25.0gr in pmc brass with no real pressure signs.

      Comment

      • #4
        freonr22
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Dec 2008
        • 12945

        different brass has different case capacity i think?
        sigpic
        Originally posted by dantodd
        We will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.
        Originally posted by bwiese
        They don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.
        Originally posted by louisianagirl
        Our fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.

        Comment

        • #5
          Nessal
          Banned
          • Jan 2009
          • 2261

          Looking at those pics again. It does look like the primers are flattening. But the quality of you pics arent the best.

          Comment

          • #6
            freonr22
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Dec 2008
            • 12945

            sigpic
            Originally posted by dantodd
            We will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.
            Originally posted by bwiese
            They don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.
            Originally posted by louisianagirl
            Our fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.

            Comment

            • #7
              SixPointEight
              Veteran Member
              • May 2009
              • 3788

              Perhaps that combined with the COL, and the fact that I measured volume not individual charge weight. I suppose it could lead to noticeable pressure changes.

              I ought to chrono them to see where they're at. Next time I'll slow down the process and drop 1.5cc 2230, should put me around 21.0gr. But technically that's under spec. Or I'll save my LC brass for my nicer hunting loads and pull all my military brass from "plinking" circulation.

              Comment

              • #8
                Nessal
                Banned
                • Jan 2009
                • 2261

                Originally posted by JT1989
                Cannelure and bullet manufacturer reccomend 2.200 COL. And I worked up to 25.0gr in pmc brass with no real pressure signs.



                I dont understand how a bullet manufacturer can list safe oal. How would they know what powder or grains you are using? You are better of using load data from the powder maker. Accurate recommends 2.230 for that powder with 55grn bullet i believe.
                Last edited by Nessal; 07-14-2010, 2:12 PM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  SixPointEight
                  Veteran Member
                  • May 2009
                  • 3788

                  Accurate does recommend that. The manufacturer was called and spoken with, and then I wrote an email to verify. Conflicting data, but, I'd be .030 off the cannelure loading that long.

                  "Josh, If you are planning to crimp the bullet, I suggest seating to the cannelure and roll crimp it. The difference of .030" will not affect performance in an AR-15 rifle."

                  Anyways, if you feel that .030" is making a significant difference I can pull the bullets a hair and shoot the rest of em.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bohoki
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 20825

                    i noticed a couple of my loads i used the wolf primers had primer ruptures is that what i am seeing?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      SixPointEight
                      Veteran Member
                      • May 2009
                      • 3788

                      Originally posted by bohoki
                      i noticed a couple of my loads i used the wolf primers had primer ruptures is that what i am seeing?
                      All the Black? That's just nail polish. As to the belief that the primers are flattened, I can't get a decent pic of them, but they look exactly like factory PMC does after its been fired

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        sonnyt650
                        Senior Member
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 586

                        Could it be that these particular cases slipped within the chamber and slammed into the ejector bits instead of expanding normally to fill the chamber? What's your reloading procedure, does it include tumbling after sizing?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          bruce381
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 2452

                          weight your charge forget the CC stuff

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            EOD3
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 949

                            Bruce is right, you NEED a powder scale.

                            On the original problem, the LC brass typically is thicker and therefore has less capacity than the commercial brass.
                            "I don't like repeat offenders, I like DEAD offenders!" ~Ted Nugent

                            "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ~ Claire Wolfe

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              SixPointEight
                              Veteran Member
                              • May 2009
                              • 3788

                              I have a powder scale. And I did weight check my loads, but I don't check EVERY throw. It takes forever because I don't have a trickler etc. Just the lee dipper set. So I weigh out 15-20 charges, and write down what they come out as. That way I know how much powder is actually held in the dipper.

                              Anywho, I'll just rework the load for LC brass
                              Last edited by SixPointEight; 07-17-2010, 10:04 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1