Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CCI No 41 primers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • m1a1driver
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 1031

    CCI No 41 primers?

    Picked up a box of these today to try with my .223 reloads. any experiences with them? I've been using CCI SR primers and they have worked great. Thought i'd try these..
  • #2
    Chief-7700
    Veteran Member
    • May 2008
    • 3382

    Originally posted by m1a1driver
    Picked up a box of these today to try with my .223 reloads. any experiences with them? I've been using CCI SR primers and they have worked great. Thought i'd try these..
    CCI# 41 primers are Mil-spec small rifle primers you should not have any problems.

    XL-650 to feed the: .45ACP's Les Baer Concept V, Ruger SR 1911, Ruger Nightwatchman,custom built Colt M1911, Springfield .45ACP Loaded.. 9MM SA Range Officer,Ruger P-85, Springfield Stainless 9MM loaded, SA 9MM 5.25" XDM, Springfield 9mm Stainless Range Officer, STI double stack .45ACP.
    IDPA A41750 Safety Officer
    NRA Certified RSO
    "Stay out of the deep end of the pool; correct the problem with your credit card, not your dremel!"

    Comment

    • #3
      Nodda Duma
      • Nov 2007
      • 3455

      They provide a bigger punch than SR primers...you will want to reduce load by approx 0.5 - 1 grain (ie, work up a load again).

      -Jason
      Looking for photos for your wall?
      Help feed my children by clicking here.

      Comment

      • #4
        five.five-six
        CGN Contributor
        • May 2006
        • 34753

        they have a harder anvil so they won't slam-fire in AR-pattern rifles, it's all you should use

        Comment

        • #5
          Nessal
          Banned
          • Jan 2009
          • 2261

          Never had a problem with CCI #41 or 400's. Didn't notice that it was hotter either.

          Comment

          • #6
            m1a1driver
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2009
            • 1031

            excellent. Will give these a try. Thanks for the info.

            Comment

            • #7
              fairfaxjim
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2006
              • 2146

              CCI #41 and #34 primers are mil-spec versions of CCI's Small Rifle MAGNUM and Large Rifle MAGNUM primers.

              From the CCI web page:
              CCI makes rifle primers for commercial sale that matches military sensitivity specs that reduce the chance of a slam-fire when other factors go out of control.

              ...

              Mil-spec sensitivity
              Initiator mix optimized for ball/spherical propellants
              Available in large (No.34) and small (No. 41) rifle
              Use the same data as CCI Magnum primers
              (Bold Added)

              I have noticed that some load data specs magnum primers with ball powders (Win 748 for example). If you are using extruded powder (Vargent, et. al.) then you may notice a difference with #41 vs. CCI 200 SR. Use good load development technique and you will be fine.

              There is a LOT of combinations of materials available for .223/.556 - throw in all of the various barrel/chamber combinations and you have way more. Reloading allows you to fine tune all of those variables, and I recommend developing loads for each rifle, rather than going with a "one size fits all" formula.

              I have used CCI 200 with Varget, CCI 250 and #41/.556 with Win 748 and all have worked fine. I have seen a LOT of .223/.556 reloads through AR-15 style rifles using standard hardness primers without any problems. Having said that, I do use the #34 when available for loading ball powder for my AR rifles.
              Last edited by fairfaxjim; 06-28-2010, 10:17 AM.
              "As soon as we burn 'em," Chinn said, "more come in."
              Ignatius Chinn, a FORMER veteran firearms agent.
              CONTRA COSTA TIMES 03/04/2008

              "please guys please no ridiculous offers....Im a girl, not an idiot" Mistisa242

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1