Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Interesting info re: case sizing, shoulder setback, accuracy, etc.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xrMike
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2006
    • 7841

    Interesting info re: case sizing, shoulder setback, accuracy, etc.

    Some interesting reading I came across... Might be old-hat to some of you, but it's news to me.

    According to this guy, your most accurate reloaded cases will be ones where you use a full-length sizer die, but do NOT follow the instructions that usually come with the die. Instead, you adjust the die so that the shoulder is either:
    • not setback at all, or
    • set back no more than .001"

    The sections I highlighted in red indicate that (supposedly) cases sized this way yeild better accuracy than ones that are neck-sized only (which goes against everything that I THOUGHT I understood previously about sizing vs. accuracy).

    It also provides a good explanation of what "headspace" is, and how GO/NO-GO gauges work, etc.

    From: bartbob@aol.com (Bartbob)
    Newsgroups: rec.guns
    Subject: Re: Bottleneck Cases - Seating and headspace
    Date: 11 Jan 1996 09:34:11 -0500

    Your questions about reloading the .308 Winchester are good.

    Headspace for the .308 Winchester, as well as other rimless,
    bottleneck cases, is measured from the closed bolt's face to
    a datum point on the shoulder. This datum point for the
    .308 Win. is .400-inch. Minimum .308 Win. chamber headspace
    is 1.630-inch. Maximum is about 1.650-inch. New cases
    typically measure about 1.628-inch from case head to the
    shoulder's datum point so they will easily fit in minimum-
    headspace chambers, yet not stretch in firing enough to
    cause head-separation problems when fired in a maximum-
    headspace chamber. New cases typically end up with a fired-
    case headspace dimension of about .001-inch shorter than the
    chamber's actual headspace.

    Headspace is measured with steel gages precision ground to
    specific dimensions. They are put in the rifle's chamber,
    then the bolt is gently closed. If the chamber is too short
    and a minimum gage is used, the bolt won't fully close; the
    chamber must be lengthened with a reamer to fix the problem
    as new cases may not allow the bolt to be closed. If the
    chamber headspace is between the minimum and maximum limits,
    then the minimum gage will let the bolt easily close. If a
    maximum gage is put in the chamber, the bolt should not be
    able to close which verifies the chamber headspace is within
    manufacturing limits for safe use with new cases. But if
    the bolt closes on a maximum gage, chamber headspace is too
    long and new cases may rupture if fired in such a chamber.
    Minimum gages are called "go" gages, maximum gages are
    called "no-go" gages based on the idea that a the bolt
    should "go" closed on a go-gage and "no-go" closed on a
    no-go gage.

    Bottleneck sized- or new-case headspace can be measured with
    a gage such as the RCBS Precision Mic. A case is put head-
    down in the gage, then a micrometer thimble is screwed on
    and tightened until it stops against the shoulder. The gage
    is read in thousandths of an inch. Loaded rounds can also
    be measured with such gages.

    Here's what was learned back in the 1960s about sizing
    cases. It applies to the .308 as well as other rounds of
    similar size. Tests were conducted with super-accurate
    .308 Win. match rifles. Chamber headspace was 1.630-inch,
    or minimum. Rifles were held in an unrestricted machine
    rest. An unrestricted machine rest clamps the rifle's
    forend and butt much like it would be held by someone. On
    firing, it moves with the same resistance for each shot.
    It slides on three steel rods riding in V-blocks and moves
    about 3 inches when fired. The upper cradle is moved back
    forward against a stop after each shot and repositions the
    rifle exactly the same for each shot. Such machine rests
    eliminates all human variables in holding and are commonly
    used by bullet making companies and military arsenals for
    accuracy testing. Sometimes only a barreled action is
    clamped in the rest; pictures of such machine rests are
    shown in Sierra's reloading manual. The US Olympic Shooting
    Team uses similar ones for testing .22 rimfire match rifles
    and ammunition as they know humans can't test them as well
    as the rest can.

    Such tests are much, much better than shooting a highpowered
    rifle from a bench because of one important, but little
    known reason. The more recoil a rifle has, the more very,
    very slight changes in how it's held effect how it moves as
    the bullet goes down the barrel; very small changes cause
    the barrel axis to be different for each shot as the bullet
    leaves. Rifles used in 100 to 300 yard benchrest matches
    shoot mild cartridges with small powder charges and light
    bullets which are shot in virtually free-recoil conditions
    unimpeded by differences in holding which is near machine
    rest conditions. When held firmly like rifles shooting
    larger, more powerful cartridges have to be, they typically
    shoot much larger groups than the sub 1/4th-MOA ones they
    are famous for. Rifles tested in machine rests typically
    have groups with smaller spreads between largest and
    smallest ones than when conventionally benchrested. What
    this means is that most highpowered rifles actually shoot
    better than conventional benchrest techniques show.

    The .308 rifles fired in a machine rest would shoot about
    1/2-MOA test groups with cases sized correctly for best
    accuracy.
    Note that twenty or more shots were fired for
    each group. When hand-held and shouldered from a typical
    benchrest with the rifle's forend and stock toe on sand
    bags, the groups would be in the 1 MOA range. Here's a
    summary of what was learned from these tests.

    When a full-length sizing die was set in the reloading press
    as instructions said, sized cases had a head-to-shoulder
    headspace typically shorter than a new case. When fired,
    these cases produced test groups about 1.5-MOA.
    Note that
    the die was set in the press such that its bottom just
    touched the shellholder as the ram was at the top of its
    movement. This caused the case shoulder to be set back so
    the sized-case headspace dimension was typically shorter
    than that of a new case. Such instructions supplied with
    reloading presses and dies are required for two reasons
    regarding chambers with minimum headspace dimensions. First,
    the great variety of chamber sizes for a given cartridge
    vary quite a bit and the manufacturer wants to be sure sized
    cases will chamber properly. Second, the amount of case
    lube applied causes sized-case headspace to vary several
    thousandths of an inch; lightly lubed cases will have a
    longer headspace and the manufacturer wants to be sure cases
    so sized will fit in minimum headspace chambers. Cases so
    sized could be reloaded about 10 times before their head
    separation became imminent.

    Fired cases partially sized in a full-length sizing die
    with about three-fourths of the neck sized produced test
    groups about 1.5-MOA groups. Cases so sized had their
    body diameter's reduced a couple of thousandths of an inch
    which moved the shoulder forward several thousandths of an
    inch. These partially-sized cases were actually longer in
    head-to-shoulder datum point dimension than the chamber's
    headspace dimension. A slight binding was noted as the
    rounds were chambered. Case life of these cases was about
    20 to 30 reloads.

    Fired cases that were neck-only sized in dies that didn't
    have their body diameters reduced but their necks were sized
    down would shoot groups about 1-MOA groups.
    Subsequent
    firings of the same case resulted in its shoulder moving
    forward enough to cause very slight binding as the bolt was
    closed and groups opened up about 1/4th MOA with such cases.
    About 30 to 40 reloads per case was possible.

    New, never fired cases produced test groups about 3/4ths-MOA
    even with all their irregularities from manufacturing.

    The smallest test groups came from cases full-length sized
    such as the shoulder was not set back from it fired
    position. Sized-case headspace was the same as, or not more
    than .001-inch shorter than fired-case headspace. Test
    groups were about 1/2 MOA.
    And cases could be reloaded
    20 to 30 times.

    This well explains why most folks get better accuracy with
    partial-sized cases using full-length sizing dies than by
    following press/die instructions for full-length sizing. It
    also explains why they get better accuracy with neck-only
    sized cases compared to conventional full-length sizing with
    the die set according to supplied instructions.


    It should be mentioned that the machine-rest tests were made
    at 600 yards. Had the tests been done at 100 yards, the
    smallest groups would have been about 2/10ths-MOA and the
    largest ones about 3/4ths-MOA. In one test, 40 consecutive
    shots were fired into just under 2 inches at 600 yards. To
    do that well, the group at 100 yards would have to be about
    1/10th MOA.

    By using a sized-case headspace gage like the RCBS Precision
    Mic, you can set a full-length sizing die in a press such
    that it sizes the cases just enough to set the shoulder back
    no more than .001-inch. You'll probably get best accuracy
    this way as well as excellent case life.
    (to be continued... )
  • #2
    xrMike
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2006
    • 7841

    Anyway, this is a nerdy topic I know, but I think it's interesting.

    I'm currently doing case prep on my next batch of .223, and I'm going to try this out -- full-length size, but only enough to NOT bump the shoulder, or bump it no more than .001".

    I'm using the Hornady comparator tools to check everything.

    Talk about nerdish OCD... I measured the fire-formed "headspace" of 20 pieces of brass using the Hornady tools and a caliper. The average measurement came out to 1.460", and never varied more than .003" among all 20 pieces. I then set up my new Redding full-length sizer die so that my sized cases come out at either 1.460", or 1.459" at the most (1.459" = .001" of shoulder setback). With this particular die, this amount of sizing happens when the bottom of the die just barely kisses the top of the shell holder when the ram is raised all the way up.

    Assuming I do the rest of the loading process correctly, I'm hoping to squeeze a little more accuracy out of my loads, and longer life out of my brass.

    Anybody see any problems here?

    Comment

    • #3
      mif_slim
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2008
      • 10089

      I once did just neck sizing with a little full length touch at the end of the stroke. Out come was.....every case not fully sized got stuck in the chamber from the rear of the brass because its still "expanded" and couldnt fit the chamber. After that....I full lenght sized everything...especially when I had to pull 200 rounds of .223 with a inerta puller... NOT FUN!
      Originally posted by Gottmituns
      It's not protecting the rights of the 1%, it's IMPOSING new laws because of the 1%.

      Comment

      • #4
        J-cat
        Calguns Addict
        • May 2005
        • 6626

        The problem with trying to set the shoulder back .001" is that each brass case is different and springs back to a different degree. Then there's bolt-face runout which causes one side of the case to stretch more than the other. These two factors combined require shoulder setback of approximately .002" plus whatever amount of boltface runout your rifle may exhibit. Otherwise you'll be springing both the bolt and the case.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1