I just started developing a load for a 147gn RN Hi-Tek coated 9mm for the Ruger PC9.
CFE Pistol, OAL 1.125, very light crimp.
3.8gns 983 fps avg.
4.0gns 1038 fps avg.
They function reliably and were a much smoother "push" feeling than some 124gn I loaded that were shooting at 1200fps.
Since I have no way to measure actual pressure I'm wondering how far to go as this is not intended for "range" ammo, rather possibly stopping a threat at a medium distance in a worst case scenario. I'm sure they would do the job right where they are at now as they were destroying some thick lumber compared to the 124's at 50 yards. I don't feel these are very "hot" as I've had some WWB 115gn shoot in the high 1200's in this barrel but I don't have experience with heavier bullets and how they effect pressures.
I'm getting to like this powder for the longer barrels, 5" XD and 17" PC9, not so much in the 9mm Shield or .380.
CFE Pistol, OAL 1.125, very light crimp.
3.8gns 983 fps avg.
4.0gns 1038 fps avg.
They function reliably and were a much smoother "push" feeling than some 124gn I loaded that were shooting at 1200fps.
Since I have no way to measure actual pressure I'm wondering how far to go as this is not intended for "range" ammo, rather possibly stopping a threat at a medium distance in a worst case scenario. I'm sure they would do the job right where they are at now as they were destroying some thick lumber compared to the 124's at 50 yards. I don't feel these are very "hot" as I've had some WWB 115gn shoot in the high 1200's in this barrel but I don't have experience with heavier bullets and how they effect pressures.
I'm getting to like this powder for the longer barrels, 5" XD and 17" PC9, not so much in the 9mm Shield or .380.


Looks like I will be shooting a bit more 45's than normal since I have plenty of LPP's, not the worst problem to have
Comment