Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

9mm bullet weight/shape preference

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jyc
    Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 302

    9mm bullet weight/shape preference

    What is your preference in terms of cost, availability, and performance?

    I tend to shoot coated 125 gr round nose but am considering switching to 115gr for the very slight savings. Am I being a scrooge or is there little difference between the bullet weights?

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
  • #2
    anonymouscuban
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2017
    • 1440

    There is savings but its marginal. You should consider that more powder is required with lighter weight bullet. Again, marginal but you need to factor that in to get a true measure of savings.

    Honestly, I think you're splitting hairs. How the bullet performs in your gun and which you shoot better should drive your decision.

    You're better off waiting for sales and buying in bulk to save money. That's where you're gonna get the most bang for your buck.

    Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • #3
      jyc
      Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 302

      Originally posted by anonymouscuban
      There is savings but its marginal. You should consider that more powder is required with lighter weight bullet. Again, marginal but you need to factor that in to get a true measure of savings.

      Honestly, I think you're splitting hairs. How the bullet performs in your gun and which you shoot better should drive your decision.

      You're better off waiting for sales and buying in bulk to save money. That's where you're gonna get the most bang for your buck.

      Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
      That's why I'm looking for input. Why the 124gr versus the 115gr for a general plinking load that performs well in most 9mm pistols?

      Cost isn't the main focus, but an extra 75 bullets is an extra 75 bullets. It adds up over 10,000 rounds. In other words, what does the 124gr do better than the 115gr? Is it worth the slight increased expense?

      Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • #4
        anonymouscuban
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2017
        • 1440

        Originally posted by jyc
        That's why I'm looking for input. Why the 124gr versus the 115gr for a general plinking load that performs well in most 9mm pistols?

        Cost isn't the main focus, but an extra 75 bullets is an extra 75 bullets. It adds up over 10,000 rounds. In other words, what does the 124gr do better than the 115gr? Is it worth the slight increased expense?

        Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
        If all you're doing is plinking, 115g is fine. A heavier grain bullet allow one to play around with powder charge weights to lessen perceived recoil for applications like USPSA competition.

        Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • #5
          J-cat
          Calguns Addict
          • May 2005
          • 6626

          Originally posted by jyc
          That's why I'm looking for input. Why the 124gr versus the 115gr for a general plinking load that performs well in most 9mm pistols?

          Cost isn't the main focus, but an extra 75 bullets is an extra 75 bullets. It adds up over 10,000 rounds. In other words, what does the 124gr do better than the 115gr?
          Penetrate stuff.

          Comment

          • #6
            oddjob
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2003
            • 2397

            OP,

            What kind of shooting do you do? I shoot USPSA and like the 124/125 grain bullets. They are accurate, make USPSA power factor easily (weight times velocity), relatively inexpensive and easily obtained. The cost savings between 115 vs 124/125 is minimal and I would just go with the 124/125. You'll find more savings in which vendor you buy bullets from rather than the bullets themselves. Most vendors sell sample packs if you need them.

            I've shot 124's, 130's, 135's, 147's, 150's, 160's and even 170's. I'm back to 124's. They are very accurate for my needs.

            Comment

            • #7
              baranski
              Veteran Member
              • Oct 2015
              • 3852

              Have you tried 147's?
              Originally posted by ACfixer
              there's plenty of sissies and snitches roaming the hallways here.

              Comment

              • #8
                the86d
                Calguns Addict
                • Jul 2011
                • 9587

                I used to just buy Xtreme's 124gr plated FP, but came across Acme's red lipstick rounds and their regular price is about the same as Xtreme's, with a sale, AND Vet discount combined.

                I think I stuck with 124gr because they are the mid-weight, the USMC's go-to is 124gr projectiles, and they tended to knock down plates better than 115gr at my range.

                I opted for their 124gr polymer coated for .38 SPL SWC and 9mm RN.
                I have yet to load them as of yet.
                Last edited by the86d; 06-20-2020, 7:25 AM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Cowboy T
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5725

                  General purpose plinking, 115gr is just fine. As an example, we do most of our marksmanship practice with .38 Special, using a 105gr (cast) bullet and a light charge of Bullseye. Ballistically, it's the same up to at least 25 yards as the factory loads, so it's a good practice load. Makes for more range time, which is the biggest factor in improving one's marksmanship.

                  For "business" ammo, I'd prefer the 124's or 147's for the added penetration.
                  "San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
                  F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah!
                  http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos)
                  http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast)
                  http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel)
                  ----------------------------------------------------
                  To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    randomBytes
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 1607

                    FWIW I like 124gr JHP from precision delta, been very happy with them.
                    When I started reloading, all my USPSA friends used and recommended Montana Gold, but I could never catch them in stock, so tried PD and have stuck with them.

                    I'd try 147 if I could find a JHP at reasonable price, the heavier bullets make for a less snappy recoil impulse.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      sammy
                      Veteran Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3847

                      For the best VALUE in 9mm an SNS Casting 147g, coated flat point over 4.4 grains of power pistol is simply amazing in every 9mm barrel I have tried. There is a lot of garbage bullets out there the don't properly seal. A "quality" 124 grain Zero ball keyholes in both a Glock 19 and 17 at 15 yards. These are about double the price.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1