I don't get it.
This is what folks say about 30 Carbine vs. predators (e.g. bears):
And this is what folks say about 10mm vs. predators (e.g. bears)
However, in every comparable loading I could find, the 30 Carbine seems to outperform the 10mm (e.g. more muzzle energy, more penetration, etc).
Regular FMJ:
Soft Point:
"Xtreme Cavitator"
So why is 30 Carbine "woefully underpowered" whereas 10mm is considered marginally adequate vs. bear (black or brown or otherwise)?
I'm overlooking something: Bullet weight/size matters more than muzzle energy, so you gotta think about power factor (mass x velocity). If you're talking kgr x ft/s (or Ns), then 10mm can edge out the 30 Carbine. Moreover, I'm failing to account for bullet diameter, sectional density, etc.
Conventional wisdom is wrong: The 30 Carbine is fired almost exclusively out of the M1 Carbine (aka the "girlfriend/wife/young shooter" gun). In contrast, the 10mm is a man's caliber (and the 40 is just a "short and weak" sissy version of the real thing). So, we have a perception problem.
For what it's worth, I don't own either caliber (i.e. I don't have a dog in this fight); I'm just researching and trying to understand the discrepancy.
This is what folks say about 30 Carbine vs. predators (e.g. bears):
And this is what folks say about 10mm vs. predators (e.g. bears)
However, in every comparable loading I could find, the 30 Carbine seems to outperform the 10mm (e.g. more muzzle energy, more penetration, etc).
Regular FMJ:
Caliber: 30 Carbine
Brand: Remington UMC FMJ
Bullet Weight: 110 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1990 fps
Muzzle Energy: 967 ft lbs
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Remington UMC FMJ
Bullet Weight: 180 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1150 fps
Muzzle Energy: 529 ft lbs
Brand: Remington UMC FMJ
Bullet Weight: 110 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1990 fps
Muzzle Energy: 967 ft lbs
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Remington UMC FMJ
Bullet Weight: 180 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1150 fps
Muzzle Energy: 529 ft lbs
Caliber: 30 Carbine
Brand: Federal Power-Shok SP
Bullet Weight: 110 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1990 fps
Muzzle Energy: 967 ft lbs
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Federal Power-Shok JSP
Bullet Weight: 180 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1275 fps
Muzzle Energy: 650 ft lbs
Brand: Federal Power-Shok SP
Bullet Weight: 110 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1990 fps
Muzzle Energy: 967 ft lbs
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Federal Power-Shok JSP
Bullet Weight: 180 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1275 fps
Muzzle Energy: 650 ft lbs
Caliber: 30 Carbine
Brand: Underwood Xtreme Cavitator
Bullet Weight: 85 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 2100 fps
Muzzle Energy: 832 ft lbs
Penetration: 22.5 inches
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Underwood Xtreme Cavitator
Bullet Weight: 100 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1825 fps
Muzzle Energy: 740 ft lbs
Penetration: 18.0 inches
Brand: Underwood Xtreme Cavitator
Bullet Weight: 85 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 2100 fps
Muzzle Energy: 832 ft lbs
Penetration: 22.5 inches
vs.
Caliber: 10mm Auto
Brand: Underwood Xtreme Cavitator
Bullet Weight: 100 grains
Muzzle Velocity: 1825 fps
Muzzle Energy: 740 ft lbs
Penetration: 18.0 inches
I'm overlooking something: Bullet weight/size matters more than muzzle energy, so you gotta think about power factor (mass x velocity). If you're talking kgr x ft/s (or Ns), then 10mm can edge out the 30 Carbine. Moreover, I'm failing to account for bullet diameter, sectional density, etc.
Conventional wisdom is wrong: The 30 Carbine is fired almost exclusively out of the M1 Carbine (aka the "girlfriend/wife/young shooter" gun). In contrast, the 10mm is a man's caliber (and the 40 is just a "short and weak" sissy version of the real thing). So, we have a perception problem.
For what it's worth, I don't own either caliber (i.e. I don't have a dog in this fight); I'm just researching and trying to understand the discrepancy.

Comment