Let me start by saying I'm using H-110 powder in 44 magnum - a recipe which calls for the use of magnum primers.
When working up my testing loads, I loaded 5 of each powder charge using magnum and 5 using regular primers. The velocities were higher using magnum primers, some powder charges yielded a different variance than others. Surprisingly, in some cases, the velocities were damn near identical... making me wonder if it made sense to buy and stock magnum primers at all. However, for many of the 'sweet spot' loads where velocity, extreme spread, and standard deviation (SD) were the most consistent, the regular primers yielded a single digit SD while the magnum primers yielded a 12-17 SD (apologies, I don't have my chrono data in front of me, but can updated this with exact figures this evening). Same gun, same day, shot back to back, etc, etc.
Questions:
1. Has anyone else experienced this? Especially interested where a recipe specifically calls for a magnum primer.
2. Based on this experience, should I just go forward with standard primers versus magnum? It'd be one less component to stock and keep around, plus large magnum primers are sometimes more expensive, depending on where you look. I did unfortunately introduce one added variable. The magnum versus regular primers were of different brand, so I realize I'm asking to make a determination that is not exactly scientific.
P.S., this test ended with a good hand ache, as shooting 50+ full house 44 magnums in a row turned out to be about as much fun as it sounds
P.P.S, the load range and firearm used for reference. Standard disclaimer: test your own loads, I don't assume responsibility or make any safety claims:
S&W 29-10
6.5" barrel
H-110 powder charges 22.5gr - 23.5gr
240gr Keith style Hi-tek Acme bullet
CCI large magnum primers
S&B large regular primers
OAL 1.600"
Pretty good roll crimp but don't have that measurement handy at the moment.
When working up my testing loads, I loaded 5 of each powder charge using magnum and 5 using regular primers. The velocities were higher using magnum primers, some powder charges yielded a different variance than others. Surprisingly, in some cases, the velocities were damn near identical... making me wonder if it made sense to buy and stock magnum primers at all. However, for many of the 'sweet spot' loads where velocity, extreme spread, and standard deviation (SD) were the most consistent, the regular primers yielded a single digit SD while the magnum primers yielded a 12-17 SD (apologies, I don't have my chrono data in front of me, but can updated this with exact figures this evening). Same gun, same day, shot back to back, etc, etc.
Questions:
1. Has anyone else experienced this? Especially interested where a recipe specifically calls for a magnum primer.
2. Based on this experience, should I just go forward with standard primers versus magnum? It'd be one less component to stock and keep around, plus large magnum primers are sometimes more expensive, depending on where you look. I did unfortunately introduce one added variable. The magnum versus regular primers were of different brand, so I realize I'm asking to make a determination that is not exactly scientific.
P.S., this test ended with a good hand ache, as shooting 50+ full house 44 magnums in a row turned out to be about as much fun as it sounds

P.P.S, the load range and firearm used for reference. Standard disclaimer: test your own loads, I don't assume responsibility or make any safety claims:
S&W 29-10
6.5" barrel
H-110 powder charges 22.5gr - 23.5gr
240gr Keith style Hi-tek Acme bullet
CCI large magnum primers
S&B large regular primers
OAL 1.600"
Pretty good roll crimp but don't have that measurement handy at the moment.

Comment