Who all is using Quick Load. I know that Randall does. Thinking of buying a copy. Looking for input/info, likes/dislikes, pros/cons, etc.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick Load Software?
Collapse
X
-
+1 Any other options, or is QuickLoad the end all be all? (Seems like it is...)"The right "to carry arms in the militia for the purpose of killing game" is worthy of the mad hatter. Thus, these purposive qualifying phrases positively establish that "to bear arms" is not limited to military use." - Justice Scalia
-Heller v. District of Columbia -
I have been looking at the software as well. I have been worikng on new bullet designs (machined from barstock). From the research I have done Quickload has several issues that are unavoidable when using simulation software.
1. No way to account for pressure variations due to bore diameter, chamber size, or twist rates.
2. No way to account for variations in powder burn rate (since these are not known for every lot of powder)
3. No way to account for variations in primers. This is a huge one since different primer brands can cause pressure variations as high as 10,000 PSI!. Which would render any data useless.
4. Bullet construction is also a big variable. Some bullet sare just harder to engrave than others. Quickload has a starting (engraving) pressure input, but it is a wild guess at best.
The good points of Quickload are that all things being equal it is very informative to see how pressure changes as you change variable (bullet seating, weight, etc.
The only way to tell what pressure YOU will get in YOUR firearm is to set it up with a strain gauge, and shoot it.Comment
-
ok I know its Necro, but i was thinking about the software too. $149
Last edited by freonr22; 03-09-2010, 7:11 PM.sigpic
Originally posted by dantoddWe will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.Originally posted by bwieseThey don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.Originally posted by louisianagirlOur fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.Comment
-
Chrono your loads.I have been looking at the software as well. I have been worikng on new bullet designs (machined from barstock). From the research I have done Quickload has several issues that are unavoidable when using simulation software.
1. No way to account for pressure variations due to bore diameter, chamber size, or twist rates.
2. No way to account for variations in powder burn rate (since these are not known for every lot of powder)
3. No way to account for variations in primers. This is a huge one since different primer brands can cause pressure variations as high as 10,000 PSI!. Which would render any data useless.
4. Bullet construction is also a big variable. Some bullet sare just harder to engrave than others. Quickload has a starting (engraving) pressure input, but it is a wild guess at best.
The good points of Quickload are that all things being equal it is very informative to see how pressure changes as you change variable (bullet seating, weight, etc.
The only way to tell what pressure YOU will get in YOUR firearm is to set it up with a strain gauge, and shoot it.
Work backwards in quickload until the velocity matches.
As long as all your other known inputs are correct, you can adjust powder burn rates and engraving pressures to match up to your chrono data.
THEN the pressure data is probably really close too.Randall Rausch
AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
Most work performed while-you-wait.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,010
Posts: 25,113,978
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,732
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5180 users online. 135 members and 5045 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment