Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Anyone Here know Domain and DNS Configuration? - IT WORKS!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    goodlookin1
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 2557

    Originally posted by ocabj
    Running DHCP services off a DC is unnecessary. DHCP and DNS are technically independent of one another. If you already have an existing appliance or server that is providing DHCP leases, turning that off and lighting it up on the DC doesn't really bring you any closer to a solution to this issue.
    I totally agree. But when these funky issues arise, I prefer to take the path of least resistance: Eliminating as many potential culprits as possible. In this case, I'd rather have all the problems coming from the server than problems coming potentially from both the router and the server.
    www.FirearmReviews.net

    Comment

    • #32
      ke6guj
      Moderator
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Nov 2003
      • 23725

      Originally posted by goodlookin1
      The router is no longer giving off the DHCP, the server is. The workstation should still have the router's gateway even with this setup? I thought with the server now doing DHCP, it would also become the gateway?
      no, the router is still the gateway to the outside world. whatever DHCP server you end up using, on the DC or in the router itself should give out the router address as the gateway.

      the DC needs to have the router IP address as its gateway. on the DC, you have its DNS settings in the NIC point to itself and in whatever DHCP server you end up with, the client DNS settings should point to the DNS server on the DC.
      Jack



      Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

      No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

      Comment

      • #33
        goodlookin1
        Veteran Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 2557

        Originally posted by ke6guj
        no, the router is still the gateway to the outside world. whatever DHCP server you end up using, on the DC or in the router itself should give out the router address as the gateway.

        the DC needs to have the router IP address as its gateway. on the DC, you have its DNS settings in the NIC point to itself and in whatever DHCP server you end up with, the client DNS settings should point to the DNS server on the DC.
        Assume for below:
        Server IP: 192.168.1.3
        Router IP: 192.168.1.1
        Workstation IP: 192.168.1.100

        So my setup should look like this?:

        Server:
        IP: 192.168.1.3
        SM: 255.255.255.0
        DG: 192.168.1.1
        DNS: 192.168.1.1

        Workstation
        IP: 192.168.1.100
        SM: 255.255.255.0
        DG: 192.168.1.1
        DNS: 192.168.1.3

        I was under the impression that the Workstation should be set like this (but the server would remain as above):

        Workstation
        IP: 192.168.1.100
        SM: 255.255.255.0
        DG: 192.168.1.3
        DNS: 192.168.1.3
        Last edited by goodlookin1; 08-02-2013, 2:14 PM.
        www.FirearmReviews.net

        Comment

        • #34
          ke6guj
          Moderator
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Nov 2003
          • 23725

          assuming you have DNS properly configured on server, it should be set as the following.


          Originally posted by goodlookin1
          Assume for below:
          Server IP: 192.168.1.3
          Router IP: 192.168.1.1
          Workstation IP: 192.168.1.100

          So my setup should look like this?:

          Server:
          IP: 192.168.1.3
          SM: 255.255.255.0
          DG: 192.168.1.1
          DNS: 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.3

          Workstation
          IP: 192.168.1.100
          SM: 255.255.255.0
          DG: 192.168.1.1
          DNS: 192.168.1.3

          I was under the impression that the Workstation should be set like this (but the server would remain as above):

          Workstation
          IP: 192.168.1.100
          SM: 255.255.255.0
          DG: 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.1
          DNS: 192.168.1.3

          on the server's dns settings, you would add forwarders to public DNS server like 4.2.2.2 and 8.8.8.8, or maybe to your ISP's private DNS server.

          so, on whatever DHCP server you end up using, you need to set the DG as 192.168.1.1 and DNS as 192.168.1.3
          Last edited by ke6guj; 08-02-2013, 2:35 PM.
          Jack



          Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

          No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

          Comment

          • #35
            goodlookin1
            Veteran Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 2557

            Originally posted by ke6guj
            assuming you have DNS properly configured on server, it should be set as the following.





            on the server's dns settings, you would add forwarders to public DNS server like 4.2.2.2 and 8.8.8.8, or maybe to your ISP's private DNS server.

            so, on whatever DHCP server you end up using, you need to set the DG as 192.168.1.1 and DNS as 192.168.1.3

            Ok, gotcha, thanks!
            www.FirearmReviews.net

            Comment

            • #36
              ke6guj
              Moderator
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Nov 2003
              • 23725

              oh, and if you were planning on installing WINS on the server, then that needs to be added to the scope options as well to tell the clients that WINS is at 192.168.1.3, and with the basic DHCP servers included in some routers, you might not even have the option to set additional scope options beyond the basic DNS and gateway options.
              Jack



              Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

              No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

              Comment

              • #37
                goodlookin1
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2009
                • 2557

                Ok, some progress: I can now ping the domain.local from both the server and workstation. Everything ***appears*** to be working, except when I go to test the domain. Here is the DCDIAG report from the server:

                Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
                (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

                C:\Windows\system32>dcdiag /test:dns

                Directory Server Diagnosis

                Performing initial setup:
                Trying to find home server...
                Home Server = PRECISION
                * Identified AD Forest.
                Done gathering initial info.

                Doing initial required tests

                Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\PRECISION
                Starting test: Connectivity
                The host c4c0fbe3-9f77-4e7e-9022-14d1a8ba5318._msdcs.PMPMED.local
                could not be resolved to an IP address. Check the DNS server, DHCP,
                server name, etc.
                Got error while checking LDAP and RPC connectivity. Please check your
                firewall settings.
                ......................... PRECISION failed test Connectivity

                Doing primary tests

                Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\PRECISION

                Starting test: DNS

                DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
                ......................... PRECISION passed test DNS

                Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones

                Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones

                Running partition tests on : Schema

                Running partition tests on : Configuration

                Running partition tests on : PMPMED

                Running enterprise tests on : PMPMED.local
                Starting test: DNS
                Test results for domain controllers:

                DC: PRECISION
                Domain: PMPMED.local


                TEST: Basic (Basc)
                Error: No LDAP connectivity
                Warning: adapter
                [00000010] Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet has invalid
                DNS server: 192.168.10.10 (precision.)
                Error: all DNS servers are invalid
                No host records (A or AAAA) were found for this DC

                TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
                Warning: Failed to add the test record dcdiag-test-record in z
                one PMPMED.local

                TEST: Records registration (RReg)
                Error: Record registrations cannot be found for all the network
                adapters

                Summary of test results for DNS servers used by the above domain
                controllers:

                DNS server: 192.168.10.10 (precision.)
                1 test failure on this DNS server
                Name resolution is not functional. _ldap._tcp.PMPMED.local. faile
                d on the DNS server 192.168.10.10

                Summary of DNS test results:

                Auth Basc Forw Del Dyn RReg Ext
                __________________________________________________ _______________
                Domain: PMPMED.local
                PRECISION PASS FAIL PASS PASS WARN FAIL n/a

                ......................... PMPMED.local failed test DNS
                I have stopped the Netlogon service, flushed the dns and registered it, then started the Netlogon service again, but it's still not kicking over.

                I have added A host records in every location I can think of. I eve created an A record that included the GUID._msdcs.PMPMED.local and did the same for a CNAME record, but no dice.

                Any ideas?
                www.FirearmReviews.net

                Comment

                • #38
                  goodlookin1
                  Veteran Member
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 2557

                  IT WORKS NOW!!!

                  Alright, so I think the culprit was the updates on the DNS records. I had checked off "secure only", but I read a post online that someone had the same issue as me and had changed to "secure and unsecure updates". So I changed to that and did some other things (once again, reinstalled everything, dropped DHCP and put it back onto the router, reconfigured the DNS forwarders, etc). I also forgot that I had changed the subnet of the network but forgot to change it on the switch (it's managed), so I reconfigured the switch as well to reflect the proper network subnet.

                  Once I did these things, I saw the additional automatic DNS entries that I didnt have before. I then did the DCDIAG test on the DNS and it connected successfully. I then pinged the FQDN from the workstation and that worked as well. I finally tried joining the workstation to the Domain and SUCCESS!

                  Long couple days on this project.....about 13 hours just to get it working right. Now I finally get to do the configuration of the users, rights management, etc, and I can get past all of this guess and check garbage :-)

                  Thanks for all the suggestions.
                  www.FirearmReviews.net

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    the86d
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 9587

                    I believe that the term "FQDN" requires official registration (at the DNS root zone too)... externally.

                    Correct me if I am wrong, as Wikipedia has had some misinformation, as have all of us : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fully_q...ed_domain_name

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      ocabj
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 7924

                      fully qualified domain name doesn't have to be publicly registered. I could literally create a private namespace using RFC 1918 addresses on my home/office network with the .ocabj TLD and have the FQDN for my ldap server to be ldap.ocabj such that "nslookup ldap.ocabj" or "ping ldap.ocabj" works as long as it's in my own local DNS that's authoritative for the zone.

                      In real world, you often see Windows AD hosts have long FQDNs internal only to the Windows domain hosts because the DNS for that AD isn't being forwarded to other DNS servers for that organization whose clients aren't in the AD Domain.

                      Distinguished Rifleman #1924
                      NRA Certified Instructor (Rifle and Metallic Cartridge Reloading) and RSO
                      NRL22 Match Director at WEGC

                      https://www.ocabj.net

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1