Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CF SSD - IDE Replacement?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • prc104
    Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 427

    CF SSD - IDE Replacement?

    Anyone done this with a laptop? Just curious how it worked out. I've got (2) laptops here I'd like to keep running, and the CF/IDE adaptors caught my eye on ebay versus a PATA/SSD.

    Also, I'd like to know how CF cards are graded as far write and read speeds. Seems there is some controversy and differing standards.

    Anyone have any thoughts?

    Thanks
    Know what's right, To know what's wrong.
  • #2
    billofrights
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Oct 2012
    • 2343

    Even the fastest one will be ridiculously slow. I tried it once and it was painful to boot.

    Comment

    • #3
      Merc1138
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Feb 2009
      • 19742

      Did that once for a desktop running a linux build as a firewall, slowest thing I've ever seen. Ran great once everything was in RAM, but CF for storage is just painfully slow, even the "fastest" CF cards are horrible.

      Comment

      • #4
        MaHoTex
        Calguns Addict
        • Jul 2010
        • 5002

        Wow... It looks like the max xfer rate of a CF is 167 Mbyte/s

        SSDs are at 6 Gbyte/s

        Slow is an understatement...
        NRA Life Member

        sigpic

        Mr. President, I can't take any more winning! Make it stop Mr. President. The winning is YUGGEEEE!

        "If you've got a problem with the US, you better make sure it's not a military problem." SSgt Leslie Edwards

        Comment

        • #5
          sfwdiy
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 2146

          Total waste of time. In addition to the fact that you've got a 6Gbps SATA bus, SATA SSDs also have cache and the data is striped across multiple chips. The larger the drive capacity, the faster.

          Don't even bother.

          --B
          Need data recovery? CLICK HERE for a discount on your next recovery from DriveSavers!

          Comment

          • #6
            prc104
            Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 427

            Just to clarify, not SATA, just PATA-IDE for an older laptop.

            Found some youtube videos that make it appear that the CF-IDE adaptor approach is much faster for loading programs on a basic laptop.

            Seems more research is needed...
            Know what's right, To know what's wrong.

            Comment

            • #7
              Merc1138
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2009
              • 19742

              Originally posted by prc104
              Just to clarify, not SATA, just PATA-IDE for an older laptop.

              Found some youtube videos that make it appear that the CF-IDE adaptor approach is much faster for loading programs on a basic laptop.

              Seems more research is needed...
              Throw it out and find a cheap SATA laptop that's 3-5 years old.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1