Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CISPA just passed the House.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cycle61
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 377

    CISPA just passed the House.

    The government is writing themselves a blank warrant to snoop on basically everything you ever have done or will do online, under the righteous banner of "cybersecurity" and protecting the children. This bill has bipartisan support, with many representatives voting across party lines to approve or deny the measure.

    More details:

  • #2
    JDay
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Nov 2008
    • 19393

    Originally posted by cycle61
    The government is writing themselves a blank warrant to snoop on basically everything you ever have done or will do online, under the righteous banner of "cybersecurity" and protecting the children. This bill has bipartisan support, with many representatives voting across party lines to approve or deny the measure.

    More details:

    http://www.businessinsider.com/cispa...e-house-2012-4
    Not really, I looked at the votes and it was mostly Republicans who voted for it.



    Republicans:
    Yea - 206
    Nay - 28
    Not Voting - 7

    Democrats:
    Yea - 42
    Nay - 140
    Not Voting - 8
    That comes out to 28% Democrats vs 85% Republicans.
    Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

    The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

    Comment

    • #3
      Autarchist
      Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 188

      Folks in the government have realized how dangerous the internet is to their power.

      They want us getting our information from the state-controlled MSM.

      Comment

      • #4
        Nose Nuggets
        Calguns Addict
        • Apr 2008
        • 6801

        Originally posted by Autarchist
        Folks in the government have realized how dangerous the internet is to their power.

        They want us getting our information from the state-controlled MSM.
        This is where i would put my money, if i was a gambling man.


        "It is to secure our rights that we resort to government at all." -Thomas Jefferson

        Comment

        • #5
          cycle61
          Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 377

          Originally posted by JDay


          That comes out to 28% Democrats vs 85% Republicans.
          Exactly. Both parties are trying to control and invade your rights and privacy. Both seem perfectly comfortable wiping their *** with the bill of rights and the constitution. Would a real Libertarian party be too much to ask at this point?
          Last edited by cycle61; 04-27-2012, 9:21 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            wjc
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Dec 2009
            • 10884

            Looks like we are back to plotting in taverns....
            sigpic

            NRA Benefactor Member
            NRA Golden Eagle
            SAF Life Member
            CGN Contributor

            Comment

            • #7
              JDay
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Nov 2008
              • 19393

              Originally posted by cycle61
              Exactly. Both parties are trying to control and invade your rights and privacy. Both seem perfectly comfortable wiping their *** with the bill of rights and the constitution. Would a real Libertarian party be too much to ask at this point?
              I think my post went right over your head. I pointed out that the Democrats for the most part are against this bill, probably because it's an election year. In any case I hope this bill dies before it can become law.
              Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

              The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

              Comment

              • #8
                Demonicspire
                Member
                • Apr 2012
                • 197

                Obama says " I will veto" and unless they can come up with 30 more votes, they can't override him.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Yugo
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 8409

                  sigpic

                  Originally posted by WAMO556
                  Voting for Donald Trump is the protest vote against: Keynesian economics, Neocon wars, exporting jobs, open borders, Washington criminal cartel, too big to fail banks and too big to jail pols and banksters.

                  Cutting off foreign aid to EVERY country and dismantling the police/surveillance state!

                  Umm yeah!!!!!

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    JDay
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 19393

                    Originally posted by Demonicspire
                    Obama says " I will veto" and unless they can come up with 30 more votes, they can't override him.
                    He has promised a lot of things that he never delivered on. Not to mention he signed ACTA yet spoke out against SOPA and PIPA, it's all posturing in order to fool the masses who are likely to vote for him this election.
                    Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

                    The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Demonicspire
                      Member
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 197

                      Originally posted by JDay
                      He has promised a lot of things that he never delivered on. Not to mention he signed ACTA yet spoke out against SOPA and PIPA, it's all posturing in order to fool the masses who are likely to vote for him this election.
                      Well, I'm not sure why he'd reverse his position on the veto, barring a radical shift of the political landscape. Anywho, I hope he vetos it.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Autarchist
                        Member
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 188

                        Originally posted by Demonicspire
                        Well, I'm not sure why he'd reverse his position on the veto, barring a radical shift of the political landscape. Anywho, I hope he vetos it.
                        If he vetos it this time around, he will surely sign the next incarnation, which will most likely be even worse, during his next term when he doesn't need to worry about re-election.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Demonicspire
                          Member
                          • Apr 2012
                          • 197

                          Originally posted by Autarchist
                          If he vetos it this time around, he will surely sign the next incarnation, which will most likely be even worse, during his next term when he doesn't need to worry about re-election.
                          Who knows, at the very least the veto would give time for support to be rallied. Would you rather he not veto it?

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Autarchist
                            Member
                            • Feb 2012
                            • 188

                            Originally posted by Demonicspire
                            Who knows, at the very least the veto would give time for support to be rallied. Would you rather he not veto it?
                            I'd prefer that people would finally see through the veil of false legitimacy sheilding the government, and they stopped supporting the institution completely. Then we can finally let it wither away and die, just like every other outdated ideological paradigm does eventually. "Government", as we have it today, really hasn't changed much since the days when people pooped in the dirt and attributed illnesses to demonic possessions, and it really shows given the lack of rationality and critical thinking ability one must have to support such an oppressive and damaging insitution.

                            Whether they crank down control over the internet this year or next doesn't matter a whole lot. One thing all governments do is grow. The idea of a "limited" government is a farse, an impossible ideal.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Demonicspire
                              Member
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 197

                              Originally posted by Autarchist
                              I'd prefer that people would finally see through the veil of false legitimacy sheilding the government, and they stopped supporting the institution completely. Then we can finally let it wither away and die, just like every other outdated ideological paradigm does eventually. "Government", as we have it today, really hasn't changed much since the days when people pooped in the dirt and attributed illnesses to demonic possessions, and it really shows given the lack of rationality and critical thinking ability one must have to support such an oppressive and damaging insitution.

                              Whether they crank down control over the internet this year or next doesn't matter a whole lot. One thing all governments do is grow. The idea of a "limited" government is a farse, an impossible ideal.
                              Oh sorry, totally didn't process your avatar till now, silly me. I think of it this way "American Democracy is a terrible system of government, but the others are all so much worse"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1