Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Enterprise conversion from XP to Win7

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    steadyrock
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Aug 2007
    • 10236

    Originally posted by meaty-btz
    This.

    No, most of our applications were 32-bit with more going 64-bit every year. There are CRITICAL things you need to have in order and questions answered before you begin your migration. Moving to Windows 7 is NONTRIVIAL. How about your domain? Are you on server 2008R2? Is your domain ready for Windows 7? If not, you really need to get ready for it. A ton changed and how you do things have changed. Item Level Targeting, various oddities in how GPO's apply. Printer mapping gotcha's. User share issues. It is HUGE just preparing and migrating from a Server 2003 to a windows 7, Server 2008R2 domain (64-bit only btw so you will need servers that support it). How about your Exchange Server, did you know there are critical issues and alterations that have to be solved when migrating your Exchange Server? Did you know running Server 2008R2 Domain pretty much requires you to update your Exchange Server or all kinds of weird things can go wrong?

    Hardware, compatible with windows 7? Sure, we have several thousand HP desktops have 100% drivers for Windows 7 and are in use and deployed. Did you know, however, that the front audio out ports are NON-FUNCTIONAL under windows 7? Yeah, who knew...

    How about machine imaging, changes here as well. New options and new gotcha's.

    DO you have a roadmap?

    Legacy Applications?

    Seriously this is a non-trivial thing in any REAL enterprise environment. We began our migration almost two years ago with back-end upgrades and then slowly but surely got into compliance and then THIS Fall we began major desktop migration. The process will not be completed until well into next year.
    Did you upgrade your domain controllers just because they were on your roadmap or did some aspect of Win 7 force the upgrade? As far as I have been able to tell, Win 7 is compatible with Win 2003 DC's correct?
    Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

    Comment

    • #17
      SouperMan
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 1463

      Originally posted by steadyrock
      Did you upgrade your domain controllers just because they were on your roadmap or did some aspect of Win 7 force the upgrade? As far as I have been able to tell, Win 7 is compatible with Win 2003 DC's correct?
      Upgraded to Server 2008 to take advantage of health monitoring via SCCM which took over our WSUS server, giving it a more homogeneous environment.

      Sent from my mobile via Tapatalk.

      Comment

      • #18
        steadyrock
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Aug 2007
        • 10236

        Originally posted by SouperMan
        Upgraded to Server 2008 to take advantage of health monitoring via SCCM which took over our WSUS server, giving it a more homogeneous environment.

        Sent from my mobile via Tapatalk.
        Thanks.
        Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

        Comment

        • #19
          odysseus
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Dec 2005
          • 10407

          Originally posted by steadyrock
          Did you upgrade your domain controllers just because they were on your roadmap or did some aspect of Win 7 force the upgrade? As far as I have been able to tell, Win 7 is compatible with Win 2003 DC's correct?
          Compatible, yes on an extended 2003 Directory Service. However a lot of new services that also mate up with win 7 are obviously not there as with a 2008 Server DC native deployment, and I am sure you are looking to upgrade the enterprise anyway from 2003's end of life.
          "Just leave me alone, I know what to do." - Kimi Raikkonen

          The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.' and that `Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty.'
          - John Adams

          http://www.usdebtclock.org/

          Comment

          • #20
            meaty-btz
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2010
            • 8980

            What they said above. Also there are features in the GPO's of Server 2003 that do not fire on Windows 7 and Windows 7 have many (read hundreds) of new features and controls that require Server 2008R2 for them to be properly set.

            What really cooks our noodles is we are already looking at the upgrade to SQL Server 2012 coming soon. It just never ends. Just chasing your tail in a circle, forever. Let's not even go into our new Virtual Machine model for desktop use. Argh.
            Last edited by meaty-btz; 03-01-2012, 2:58 PM.
            ...but their exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level, and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom.

            Comment

            • #21
              steadyrock
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Aug 2007
              • 10236

              Originally posted by odysseus
              Compatible, yes on an extended 2003 Directory Service. However a lot of new services that also mate up with win 7 are obviously not there as with a 2008 Server DC native deployment, and I am sure you are looking to upgrade the enterprise anyway from 2003's end of life.
              Yes, it's on our roadmap but I was just wondering if I need to rejuggle priorities. Sounds like we'll be OK for a little while, which is good since I have a hard date for the first phase of my Win 7 rollout and I really don't have room to slip a 2008r2 migration in there as well.
              Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1