Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Question for network guru's re: Yahoo IM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • high_revs
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Feb 2006
    • 7630

    Question for network guru's re: Yahoo IM

    So we use office communicator at work, but that instant messaging tool doesn't have a way to only show you online to select people. meaning, you're open to the whole world in our company. Problem is, we get a lot of knocks on the door that are very interruptive to a point even our management don't log-in at time. So in our team, we use Yahoo IM so we can hide on official tool and still connect for work if we need to (just our team).

    Problem I noticed is that when you freshly boot up, yahoo cannot connect. wait an hour or two, suddenly it can. I've done nothing at this point other than just do my usual biz.

    I've run ipconfig /flushdns, ipconfig /registerdns, ipconfig /renew to see if that would fix it. Oddly, if I put the laptop to sleep when i leave home instead of shut down, I can connect to yahoo IM instantly about half the time. But if I reboot, there's some latency in there I can't figure out. We are behind a firewall of course, and have to use a proxy server. I already disable the wifi card to ensure I only have 1 network connection going to see if that might be an issue (but proven not to be when I forget)

    using windows 7 enterprise, and yahoo IM 10.0.0.128. can't seem to get the newest version working at all at work so using an older version.

    Oddly, I also use msn IM and that connects instantly. all using same settings (msn and yahoo) on my internet options - lan settings. It connects instantly whether from sleep or shut down. (hibernation doesn't work right now due to symantech endpoint issues).
  • #2
    sevensix2x51
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3835

    Im not an internet guru, and I abhor yahoo, but have you tried google talk? If the team is small, it would seem that the simple solution is to swap chat programs...

    Comment

    • #3
      Ricky-Ray
      Veteran Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 3161

      I could be the firewall that your company is using.
      Ray

      "If you lead your life the right way, the karma will take care of itself. The dreams will come to you." - Randy Paush, Carnegie Mellon University

      Comment

      • #4
        xrMike
        Calguns Addict
        • Feb 2006
        • 7841

        Originally posted by high_revs
        So we use office communicator at work, but that instant messaging tool doesn't have a way to only show you online to select people. meaning, you're open to the whole world in our company. Problem is, we get a lot of knocks on the door that are very interruptive to a point even our management don't log-in at time. So in our team, we use Yahoo IM so we can hide on official tool and still connect for work if we need to (just our team).
        So you're allowed to just go "Offline" in OC when you don't want to be bothered?

        Must be nice; wish I could get away with that!

        Comment

        • #5
          sfwdiy
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 2146

          We use Skype. It's very adept at circumventing firewalls and it's encrypted. The only difficulty with it is that because it's so hard to pin down it makes it impossible to shape it's traffic.

          --B
          Need data recovery? CLICK HERE for a discount on your next recovery from DriveSavers!

          Comment

          • #6
            high_revs
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Feb 2006
            • 7630

            Originally posted by xrMike
            So you're allowed to just go "Offline" in OC when you don't want to be bothered?

            Must be nice; wish I could get away with that!
            haha Mike! I still have to meet up with you one of these days. Keep forgetting. Maybe you'll be in Palo Alto soon with what's going on Cupertino site.

            yeah, i log off. We get interrupted all the time and as you kind of insinuate, the stupid IM tool becomes an attendance tracker! sigh... We complained already to mgmt about this behavior evolution on how instant message is viewed. I mean, it's not a "mandatory" thing to be online all the time if you ever complain to HR> There's no company policy on it. LOL


            It is just really strange. Wait an hr and suddenly, you can log in. No changes at all to my network settings, other assets, or even moving from one desk to another (ironing out my network plug is bad). I wonder if there's some kind of port sensing/sniffing or something in the network.

            Comment

            • #7
              Satex
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              CGN Contributor
              • Feb 2006
              • 3501

              Originally posted by high_revs
              Problem I noticed is that when you freshly boot up, yahoo cannot connect. wait an hour or two, suddenly it can. I've done nothing at this point other than just do my usual biz.
              I think I have seen that before. I think what's going on is that your computer boots up, but the network interface lags behind. Yahoo Messenger ends up starting before the network interface is fully configured and therefore it tries to be nice, it goes to sleep, and then periodically tests to see if the network interface is up and running.

              Comment

              • #8
                JDay
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Nov 2008
                • 19393

                This is a common issue with Yahoo! Messenger, just switch to something else.
                Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

                The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1