I've run AMD processors for some time. However, my last two computers have been Intel, and I've regretted it. The price to performance ratio is not there. If Intel is faster, I didn't notice it, and I sure as hell didn't notice it for the price difference.
AMD has a great offering, and with todays CPU speeds, unless you're doing tons of CPU operations, you won't notice the difference between the fastest Intel, or a moderate AMD, or visa versa. What's more limiting is your harddrive speed, and often your graphics card if you're gaming.
I use my computer a lot, and my processor rarely moves about 1GHz. Sure, I have a 2.13GHz dual core 64 bit processor, but it's all mostly wasted. All of the reviews I've recently read list the AMD X3 as being the best gaming CPU. Simply put, more cores is not better for gaming. Instead clock speed is, however there's a point where more clock speed doesn't net you a large enough improvement in performance to justify the cost.
Save the money on the CPU and get more RAM, a larger HDD, a faster video card, etc.
AMD has a great offering, and with todays CPU speeds, unless you're doing tons of CPU operations, you won't notice the difference between the fastest Intel, or a moderate AMD, or visa versa. What's more limiting is your harddrive speed, and often your graphics card if you're gaming.
I use my computer a lot, and my processor rarely moves about 1GHz. Sure, I have a 2.13GHz dual core 64 bit processor, but it's all mostly wasted. All of the reviews I've recently read list the AMD X3 as being the best gaming CPU. Simply put, more cores is not better for gaming. Instead clock speed is, however there's a point where more clock speed doesn't net you a large enough improvement in performance to justify the cost.
Save the money on the CPU and get more RAM, a larger HDD, a faster video card, etc.

Comment