I've been "brand loyal" to H for far longer than I probably should have been, Especially since I know how good other brands are in comparison. My problem is that the HP laptops I've had for the last decade or so (not the same ones, newer ones as time goes on) have all needed up being slow and twitchy in very short order. Like less than 6 months from new short.
I used to think it was my Norton AV, but I just bought my wife a new all in one from Lenovo, and even after I installed all of our software, including Norton, the time from "Restart Now" to "Fully restarted, booted up and logged in ready to work" averages 50 seconds to 1 minute 10 seconds. Both of the active HPs I have you're looking at a good 12 - 17 minutes before you can actually do anything worthwhile, like open a browser window or run Outlook.
I get that at least part of it is that I'm a cheap MF and haven't been buying the highest end computers. But I'm definitely buying solidly in the mid-range, and I frankly expected more. Has HP just given up on making good systems? Or is it their use of cheapo parts that slow everything down? I upgraded my RAM to 32 GB and literally have seen ZERO increase in lag time. But I can't justify dropping money on a better unit when this one works fine once it gets to the point where you can actually use it. We HAD to replace my wife's since she was suing hers for work and needed something stronger better and faster. My work provided me with a laptop so it's not a "need" at this point. When it comes right down to it, I'll probably go Lenovo. That's what I got the wife for the AIO, and my son has a laptop for them and it's smoking fast, even though it's older than my current HP and has 1/2 the RAM mine does. Thoughts anyone?
I used to think it was my Norton AV, but I just bought my wife a new all in one from Lenovo, and even after I installed all of our software, including Norton, the time from "Restart Now" to "Fully restarted, booted up and logged in ready to work" averages 50 seconds to 1 minute 10 seconds. Both of the active HPs I have you're looking at a good 12 - 17 minutes before you can actually do anything worthwhile, like open a browser window or run Outlook.
I get that at least part of it is that I'm a cheap MF and haven't been buying the highest end computers. But I'm definitely buying solidly in the mid-range, and I frankly expected more. Has HP just given up on making good systems? Or is it their use of cheapo parts that slow everything down? I upgraded my RAM to 32 GB and literally have seen ZERO increase in lag time. But I can't justify dropping money on a better unit when this one works fine once it gets to the point where you can actually use it. We HAD to replace my wife's since she was suing hers for work and needed something stronger better and faster. My work provided me with a laptop so it's not a "need" at this point. When it comes right down to it, I'll probably go Lenovo. That's what I got the wife for the AIO, and my son has a laptop for them and it's smoking fast, even though it's older than my current HP and has 1/2 the RAM mine does. Thoughts anyone?

Comment