Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

FCC Regulating the .NET

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dezrat
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 667

    FCC Regulating the .NET

    First off, I wear no tin foil hat, but am inquisitive.........
    Have been monitoring this whole new FCC capability to now regulate the Net just as it currently does TV and Radio. Got me to thinking, FCC banned all marketing of Cigarettes from the airwaves long ago on the grounds that they were a harmful product. May be you see where my mind is going with this....?
  • #2
    MrPlink
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Mar 2010
    • 12532

    Yes.
    Won't happen.
    The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

    disclaimer:
    everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

    Comment

    • #3
      Wallabing
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 1499

      The US government has controlled the internet since it's inception. Go ahead and live in your fantasy world if you think the internet is free.

      Comment

      • #4
        catmman
        CGSSA Coordinator
        • Jun 2012
        • 455

        I can't wait! Tired of arguing with people on this so can't wait until it happens so like Obamacare I can be right and say I told you so!
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #5
          chiefcrash
          Internet Dictator
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Jul 2006
          • 3408

          Originally posted by Dezrat
          First off, I wear no tin foil hat, but am inquisitive.........
          Have been monitoring this whole new FCC capability to now regulate the Net just as it currently does TV and Radio. Got me to thinking, FCC banned all marketing of Cigarettes from the airwaves long ago on the grounds that they were a harmful product. May be you see where my mind is going with this....?
          First: where was this decision that the FCC can now regulate the net like it does TV and Radio?

          Because all I've seen so far is now the internet will be included with Title II common carrier regulations. That's more like phones than TV/radio. Can the FCC ban you from talking about cigarettes on the phone?

          Maybe you see where I'm going with this?
          Originally posted by Kestryll
          we can not nor should not dismiss or discount my theory that in the dark of night you molest sea anemones by candlelight.
          Originally posted by TKM
          Show me on this 1st Amendment bobble-head doll where the mods touched you.
          Originally posted by Click Boom
          It is clear from this thread that citadel grad was the gunman, and Oswald his patsy.

          Comment

          • #6
            e90bmw
            Senior Member
            CGN Contributor
            • May 2013
            • 1268

            means it stays neutral.
            How many of you want to pay for a a pipe then have the carriers tell you what you can flow through that pipe?
            That's exactly what they were doing with NetFlix and other streaming services by charging a delivery premium.

            You pay for a pipe and they should just deliver what you want.
            That is what the new regulations say. Comcast can't deliver it's content and cripple NetFlix.

            How is that bad????

            Comment

            • #7
              Dezrat
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2013
              • 667

              Originally posted by chiefcrash
              First: where was this decision that the FCC can now regulate the net like it does TV and Radio?

              Because all I've seen so far is now the internet will be included with Title II common carrier regulations. That's more like phones than TV/radio. Can the FCC ban you from talking about cigarettes on the phone?

              Maybe you see where I'm going with this?
              Yes I do and thanks for taking me there. Though I know better, I was reacting to "discussion board facts" elsewhere without thorough research. I stand reproved, corrected, and quite embarrassed.....
              If mod. sees thread, please delete....

              Comment

              • #8
                Cali-Glock
                In Memoriam
                • Mar 2005
                • 3890

                Originally posted by e90bmw
                means it stays neutral.
                How many of you want to pay for a a pipe then have the carriers tell you what you can flow through that pipe?
                That's exactly what they were doing with NetFlix and other streaming services by charging a delivery premium.

                You pay for a pipe and they should just deliver what you want.
                That is what the new regulations say. Comcast can't deliver it's content and cripple NetFlix.

                How is that bad????
                This is my understanding.

                Netflix uses an enormous amount of Internet bandwith.

                Netflix pays for the bandwith at their end, the consumer pays for bandwith on their end. The current challenge is that ISPs throttle Netflix (and others) to free up bandwith on their network.

                As a consumer it looks like the problem is at Netflix's end rather than at your end.

                To me the problem is that ISPs oversell their services and a handful of high bandwith users (streaming movies, etc) use up a disproportionate percentage of the bandwith the carrier has allowed for many customers. Rather than increase their infrastructure to provide what they have sold, the quick and easy solution is to throttle Netflix (and similar high demand services)
                1 Corinthians 2:2

                "Orwell was an Optimist" - Cali-Glock
                "May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one." - Mal Reynolds

                Freedom Week: March 29-April 6, 2019 // Freedom Day: April 23-24, 2020 - Thank you, Judge Benitez!
                NRA - Endowment Member // CRPA - Life Member (Disclaimer: Everything I write is fiction. I am just here to try out ideas for my to-be-written great-American-novel.)

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1