Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

AR15 Manufacturers sued for killings (Sandy Hook)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • .40Cal
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 1271

    AR15 Manufacturers sued for killings (Sandy Hook)

    Bushmaster, an AR15 manufacturer is being sued for Newton school killings.

    My personal opinion is if you're gonna sue a gun manufacturer, you might as well sue car manufacterers too, since cars kill more people. Or how about suing the Alcohol manufacturers for getting people drunk.

    What are your thoughts on this -

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo! News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.
  • #2
    lorax3
    Super Moderator
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Jan 2009
    • 4633

    Sandy Hook was a tragedy, no doubt about it.

    But unfortunately for the Plaintiffs, Bushmaster isn't going to have liability here.

    Case dismissed.
    You think you know, but you have no idea.

    The information posted here is not legal advice. If you seek legal advice hire an attorney who is familiar with all the facts of your case.

    Comment

    • #3
      Lexustech48
      Member
      • May 2012
      • 358

      First, I offer my deepest condolences to the families that have lost their loved ones.

      However this is an absolute garbage lawsuit. This ******* could have had a handgun and done just as much damage, or a machete or shotgun or long blade kitchen knife... The rifle didnt load itself, bring it off safety and fire itself.

      Its my understanding that the mother of the shooter allowed that kid, who from what I understand had known mental disabilities/disorders, have access to fire arms. Cold as this may sound, she got what she deserved and she is as much to blame for this shooting as the shooter.

      But to blame the manufacture of the rifle because some unstable autistic ******* decided in his mind he needed to do this?

      If we are to go down this slippery slope we must then allow any company that produces any form of product that could/has been used to commit murder/manslaughter to be easily sued. Once that trial is complete then said products need to be banned.

      So we essentially will be wearing animal skins and using rocks to hunt with. But hey... its all about liability of the manufacturer... and not the retard that commits the crime? smh
      California Ex-pat, now in free America for good.

      Dont Tread On Me

      Comment

      • #4
        lorax3
        Super Moderator
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Jan 2009
        • 4633

        I'm not sure this has even been filed. The complaint is allegedly here, not showing up on the Superior Court website in Connecticut yet.

        Edit: Don't read the complaint link above unless you want to roll your eyes about how the AR-15 is better at killing than the M16 among other stupid things with no citations.
        Last edited by lorax3; 12-19-2014, 3:21 AM.
        You think you know, but you have no idea.

        The information posted here is not legal advice. If you seek legal advice hire an attorney who is familiar with all the facts of your case.

        Comment

        • #5
          Ryan in SD
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 1966

          Originally posted by .40Cal
          Bushmaster, an AR15 manufacturer is being sued for Newton school killings.

          My personal opinion is if you're gonna sue a gun manufacturer, you might as well sue car manufacterers too, since cars kill more people. Or how about suing the Alcohol manufacturers for getting people drunk.

          What are your thoughts on this -

          http://news.yahoo.com/families-newto...141435892.html
          Car companies do get sued.

          But there is no logic to any of it.

          Comment

          • #6
            MrPlink
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2010
            • 12532

            Looks like an attempt to create a new area of strict liability.
            The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

            disclaimer:
            everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

            Comment

            • #7
              MrPlink
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Mar 2010
              • 12532

              Originally posted by Ryan in SD
              Car companies do get sued.

              But there is no logic to any of it.
              Typically because of product liability due to defects in manufacturing, very different than what is alleged here.
              The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

              disclaimer:
              everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

              Comment

              • #8
                .40Cal
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 1271

                Originally posted by Ryan in SD
                Car companies do get sued.

                But there is no logic to any of it.
                I'm guessing car companies get sued for malfunctions, wrong designs, parts not compatible, or other safety issues.

                I doubt you can sue a car company if you let your 4 year old drive it, and he runs it into a tree killing himself. As a parent and an adult it's your job to supervise kids - especially if there's a "special" one. Giving access to a gun is the same as giving access to a car - kids think of them as toys without having the brains to figure out the damage.

                Suing a car company, a gun company, or anything like that... because kids were not monitored correctly, that is absurd. A kid accidentally cuts himself or other kids - let's sue the knife maker

                Comment

                • #9
                  Jimi Jah
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 18885

                  There is a Federal statute that protects gun manufacturers from wrongful death lawsuits, game over.

                  The lawyers that took money to sue ought to be sued for negligence, not Bushmaster.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    FourT6and2
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 1928

                    Originally posted by Jimi Jah
                    There is a Federal statute that protects gun manufacturers from wrongful death lawsuits, game over.

                    The lawyers that took money to sue ought to be sued for negligence, not Bushmaster.
                    The complaint/suit is using Negligent Entrustment as it's basis.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      REDdawn6
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 2447

                      Not going anywhere.... Period
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        REDdawn6
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 2447

                        It is all posturing! Bushmaster has better lawyers
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          LoadedM333
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 1691

                          A preposterous suit, Bushmaster should counter sue for Ruining their name. IMHO
                          NRA LifeTime Member

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            BLK RFL DIV
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2014
                            • 691

                            Originally posted by REDdawn6
                            It is all posturing! Bushmaster has better lawyers
                            Definitely posturing and I wonder who the money man behind it is... hmmmm, maybe a wealthy New Yorker with 20 armed body guards?

                            Click on this link to visit the BLK RFL DIV online store. BRD is a 2A dedicated clothing brand.


                            Comment

                            • #15
                              starsnuffer
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 2212

                              I'm going to start suing pottery barn and other manufacturers of spoons every time my life experience is lessened by having to sit in the close proximity of a smelly fat person.

                              -W

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1