why is this verboten in california?

[Falstaff]

Tell me again (iguess) why I cant has this in CA:

http://www.pkfirearms.com/without_options/new/1512

[ke6guj]

looks like it would be an SBR in CA.

[Merc1138]

At a glance, it would appear that the OAL when able to fire from it's shortest configuration would be under 26".

[The War Wagon]

Because you continually elect politicians afflicted with the galloping STOOPIDS?

[M1NM]

If the barrel is 16" and OAL is 26" it's a legal rifle. I think they just don't want to bother with CA and its AW definition of under 30" OAL. On the Ruger the upper is the serialized part of the gun.

[alfred1222]

The barrel is too short for it to have a stock

[ke6guj]

If the barrel is 16" and OAL is 26" it's a legal rifle. I think they just don't want to bother with CA and its AW definition of under 30" OAL. On the Ruger the upper is the serialized part of the gun.

this firearm would not be an AW, and there is no 30" OAL issue with this firearm.

The barrel is too short for it to have a stock

pretty sure that is a 16" barrel. they were sold federally with no SBR classification being mentioned.

[uhlan1]

Just because. They've never had good reasons for anything outside of "it's scary"..

[Falstaff]

Because you continually elect politicians afflicted with the galloping STOOPIDS?

[elSquid]

Tell me again (iguess) why I cant has this in CA:
http://www.pkfirearms.com/without_options/new/1512

Because PK states that they won't sell it to you?

-- Michael

[Falstaff]

Because PK states that they won't sell it to you?

-- Michael

along with the ksg.. mebbe thats it. but they will sell me an sbr/pistol lower...

[Steve_In_29]

Lack of a bullet button for the Ruger lower??

[ke6guj]

Lack of a bullet button for the Ruger lower??

doesn't need one, its a rimfire rifle.

that's not why it isn't CA-legal.

[Gryff]

Because it's ugly and $200 over-priced?

[Mojave Desert]

Because fun and cool are illegal in CA.