Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

withheld info before the lead ban - thoughts ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wfobase
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 239

    withheld info before the lead ban - thoughts ?

    read this off a different forum.


  • #2
    torquen
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 200

    Typical. I hope something can be done to allow lead but I doubt it.

    Comment

    • #3
      russ69
      Calguns Addict
      • Nov 2009
      • 9348

      I read the condor report. There was exactly one bird that died of lead poisoning from a spent projectile.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        wfobase
        Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 239

        I kinda thought that. I mean theres not that many animals being shot and killed all year round to leave that much lead to be eaten.
        now that the recent report came out to prove that there has not been any improvements on lead levels in condors in the condor lead-free zone. could that be used to repeal the new law ?

        Comment

        • #5
          SB1964
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 4876

          Here's a thought...Get your membership to your favorite range soon. As 2019 approaches, there will be no other place to shoot. Not with any leaded ammo.
          Yes I took the pic, no I didn't go swimming!

          Comment

          • #6
            russ69
            Calguns Addict
            • Nov 2009
            • 9348

            Originally posted by wfobase
            I kinda thought that. I mean theres not that many animals being shot and killed all year round to leave that much lead to be eaten...
            And yet other scavenger birds have no problem with eating lead projectiles. However don't look at lawmakers for voting with an educated purpose.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • #7
              dgax65
              Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 235

              Facts aren't going to matter. This was an ideological decision. When leftists don't like something they look for some sort of 'scientific' evidence to attack that thing. There will always be plenty of so-called scientists whose motivation is more ideological than scientific who will be more than eager to assist.

              Gill net and bottom trawling restrictions helped stabilize declining fish stocks, but that didn't stop the state from imposing draconian closures under the Marine Life Protection Act. They ignored facts to implement a system to which they were emotionally invested. And there were numerous scientists and researchers, all of whom rely on government grants, who willingly misrepresented actual fish stock data to support the action. Even though the process calls for re-evaluation of the necessity of closures, there is no realistic possibility that any of the MLPA's will ever be re-opened to unrestricted use.

              There has been no global warming in 18 years. In spite of continually rising carbon levels, the temperatures are not responding as described by the models of the global warming alarmists. Has this fact changed California's headlong rush to destroy its economy in the vain attempt to stop global warming? No. They are just doubling down in spite of all the evidence.

              Fifty years ago we were told that we needed a massive redistribution of wealth to end poverty. Well we got the massive redistribution of wealth, but there has been no substantive change in the percentage of people living in poverty. All facts showing the utter failure of the welfare state are ignored and we just keep spending more and more for a 'solution' that is doomed to failure.

              Liberals don't care about facts. They respond emotionally to situations based on their naive, and unworkable Utopian fantasy worldview. It is more important for them to feel good about themselves for 'doing something' than for that action to actually achieve positive results. They will fight tooth and nail to continue and expand on their actions, regardless of results, because it provides them with an affirmation of their self-appointed moral superiority. They think the are doing something positive and nothing will interfere with that belief. FACTS DO NOT MATTER To them.

              Marxism and all its derivative ideologies are unworkable Utopian fantasies that fail because they ignore very basic, fundamental aspects of human nature. It has failed everywhere it has been put in practice; usually with a terrible cost in lost opportunity, liberty and lives. Has that stopped leftists from continually trying to advance their fundamentally flawed ideology? No. They doggedly continue to inflict their destructive ideology on others and when it inevitably fails, they blame the victims for not being sufficiently committed to the cause. It is not a political ideology; it is a secular religion. Leftists believe their in their ideology as a matter of faith. It is like a cult. They have faith in their crackpot ideas and facts are a threat to their faith.
              sigpic
              Proud former California resident

              Comment

              • #8
                MrOrange
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2006
                • 2262

                Gee, I'm shocked.
                I meant, it is my opinion that...






                I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence
                I would advise violence. - M. Gandhi
                You're my kind of stupid. - M. Reynolds

                Comment

                • #9
                  NOTABIKER
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 7635

                  Originally posted by dgax65
                  Facts aren't going to matter. This was an ideological decision. When leftists don't like something they look for some sort of 'scientific' evidence to attack that thing. There will always be plenty of so-called scientists whose motivation is more ideological than scientific who will be more than eager to assist.

                  Gill net and bottom trawling restrictions helped stabilize declining fish stocks, but that didn't stop the state from imposing draconian closures under the Marine Life Protection Act. They ignored facts to implement a system to which they were emotionally invested. And there were numerous scientists and researchers, all of whom rely on government grants, who willingly misrepresented actual fish stock data to support the action. Even though the process calls for re-evaluation of the necessity of closures, there is no realistic possibility that any of the MLPA's will ever be re-opened to unrestricted use.

                  There has been no global warming in 18 years. In spite of continually rising carbon levels, the temperatures are not responding as described by the models of the global warming alarmists. Has this fact changed California's headlong rush to destroy its economy in the vain attempt to stop global warming? No. They are just doubling down in spite of all the evidence.

                  Fifty years ago we were told that we needed a massive redistribution of wealth to end poverty. Well we got the massive redistribution of wealth, but there has been no substantive change in the percentage of people living in poverty. All facts showing the utter failure of the welfare state are ignored and we just keep spending more and more for a 'solution' that is doomed to failure.

                  Liberals don't care about facts. They respond emotionally to situations based on their naive, and unworkable Utopian fantasy worldview. It is more important for them to feel good about themselves for 'doing something' than for that action to actually achieve positive results. They will fight tooth and nail to continue and expand on their actions, regardless of results, because it provides them with an affirmation of their self-appointed moral superiority. They think the are doing something positive and nothing will interfere with that belief. FACTS DO NOT MATTER To them.

                  Marxism and all its derivative ideologies are unworkable Utopian fantasies that fail because they ignore very basic, fundamental aspects of human nature. It has failed everywhere it has been put in practice; usually with a terrible cost in lost opportunity, liberty and lives. Has that stopped leftists from continually trying to advance their fundamentally flawed ideology? No. They doggedly continue to inflict their destructive ideology on others and when it inevitably fails, they blame the victims for not being sufficiently committed to the cause. It is not a political ideology; it is a secular religion. Leftists believe their in their ideology as a matter of faith. It is like a cult. They have faith in their crackpot ideas and facts are a threat to their faith.

                  WOW well said.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    zhoohuntr
                    Junior Member
                    • Sep 2014
                    • 47

                    Years ago a co-worker and I got into a discussion of the plight of northern California loggers. With extensive stretches of timber off limits to logging and the demise of timber plants, lots of loggers lost their livelihood. Well, my co-worker said those loggers should just change careers.
                    Here she is, a health care professional, living high on the hog, driving a Mercedes Benz SUV, suggesting that others change their profession. She doesn't realize that city folk cause the most environmental damage, paving over millions of acres of land that once sustained wildlife. And where does she think the lumber for her 3000 sq foot house comes from ? Out of thin air ? And how would she like it if some event forced her to change occupations? Can she go back to school and learn another trade ? Sheesh, the arrogance of these libs.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Sutcliffe
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 6792

                      You would think that lead levels would be a major concern for other scavengers

                      Yet, no mention of them at all.
                      The California Condor is a survivor of the Mega Fauna era. When these animals all became extinct the Condor found it hard to adapt and clung to the west coast for survival. No Mega Fauna here. Except for whale carcasses. Too bad local gov't likes to tow them out to sea, blow them up with C-4 or bury them. You want to save the condor? Allow whales to wash up on our beaches.
                      Just my own, personal opinion.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        dozer wright
                        Veteran Member
                        • Mar 2012
                        • 2764

                        Originally posted by Sutcliffe
                        Yet, no mention of them at all.
                        The California Condor is a survivor of the Mega Fauna era. When these animals all became extinct the Condor found it hard to adapt and clung to the west coast for survival. No Mega Fauna here. Except for whale carcasses. Too bad local gov't likes to tow them out to sea, blow them up with C-4 or bury them. You want to save the condor? Allow whales to wash up on our beaches.
                        Just my own, personal opinion.
                        Amd if you got up in front of Californias politicians and said Mega Fauna they would look at you like a dog humping a leg. " huh its ok just let me finish what Im doing"

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1