I remember in 1999 CA started a law to force gasoline stations to have to give out Air and Water for free. After awhile most stations started to let the air and water pumps go into a state of disrepair.
I can't blame them because why should the state come in and force them to give a service away. Air might be free, but the pump isn't free to maintain. And water certainly isn't free to the owner.
So I'm curious, why are we ok with the state coming in and forcing FFL's to have to operate at a loss. If the PPT fee is $25 DROS, which I assume goes to the state, and $10 to the FFL, then they will be operating at a loss.
Shouldn't the free market also dictate the cost of PPT rather than the state? What is the purpose of locking the PPT to $35?
I don't want to pay more than I need to but at the same rate, I think the free market should dictate prices.
I can't blame them because why should the state come in and force them to give a service away. Air might be free, but the pump isn't free to maintain. And water certainly isn't free to the owner.
So I'm curious, why are we ok with the state coming in and forcing FFL's to have to operate at a loss. If the PPT fee is $25 DROS, which I assume goes to the state, and $10 to the FFL, then they will be operating at a loss.
Shouldn't the free market also dictate the cost of PPT rather than the state? What is the purpose of locking the PPT to $35?
I don't want to pay more than I need to but at the same rate, I think the free market should dictate prices.




Comment