I'm trying to better understand how these three things are inter-related to help me become a better shooter. What I'm finding is that there seems to be two completely opposite techniques when shooting rifles: One technique, as used in bench rest competition, essentially lets the rifle recoil freely with human contact at a minimum. The other technique, such as used by military snipers, is to use a bipod (that doesn't move freely) and use body weight to "load" the bipod forward in anticipation of recoil.
I have a (very) basic understanding of ballistics (I'm still learning
) and it seems to me that the "free recoil" technique yields the highest level of accuracy, but if that's so, why don't we have bipods (or other portable devices) that allow the rifle to freely recoil while used in the field? When I use my Harris bipod (instead of sand bags) I see the rifle "jump" on recoil and my groups grow. I noticed that many "F class" competition rifles use extra wide bipods with ski's for the feet. I'm guessing the ski's help the rifle recoil in a more rear-ward than upward direction. If that works better, why don't we all use ski's (or other devices) on our bipods to allow the recoil to move more freely?
I have a (very) basic understanding of ballistics (I'm still learning
) and it seems to me that the "free recoil" technique yields the highest level of accuracy, but if that's so, why don't we have bipods (or other portable devices) that allow the rifle to freely recoil while used in the field? When I use my Harris bipod (instead of sand bags) I see the rifle "jump" on recoil and my groups grow. I noticed that many "F class" competition rifles use extra wide bipods with ski's for the feet. I'm guessing the ski's help the rifle recoil in a more rear-ward than upward direction. If that works better, why don't we all use ski's (or other devices) on our bipods to allow the recoil to move more freely?


Comment