Unconfigured Ad Widget

**afteractionreport** · 06-29-2014, 3:42 PM

Interesting...

**SB1964** · 06-29-2014, 3:44 PM

Good! Where's that cat pic, lol.

**toby** · 06-29-2014, 3:46 PM

Oh boo frkn hooo!

**morfeeis** · 06-29-2014, 4:14 PM

This is just silly, great way to waste money over something that doesn't matter one bit. No one in their right mind would mix up DD and DPMS

**gaberaynes** · 06-29-2014, 4:23 PM

Cant Remington sue them for being ankle bitters in the big pond???

**SuperSet** · 06-29-2014, 5:20 PM

This guy's counter suing Daniel Defense.

**JDPhx501** · 06-29-2014, 5:27 PM

Go Marty!

F*** Freedom Group.

**TheGaut** · 06-29-2014, 10:33 PM

Originally posted by SuperSet

This guy's counter suing Daniel Defense.

Faker than this "ad"?

**Merc1138** · 06-29-2014, 11:03 PM

Originally posted by morfeeis

This is just silly, great way to waste money over something that doesn't matter one bit. No one in their right mind would mix up DD and DPMS

Well duh. Everyone buys sub moa milspec rifles from PSA these days instead.

**deckhandmike** · 06-30-2014, 1:06 AM

They should find better things to do with there enormous profits on run of the mill AR's.

**EchoFourTango** · 06-30-2014, 1:13 AM

We shall see.

**gator68** · 06-30-2014, 9:57 AM

If you have a trademark you have to defend it. Otherwise you just lose it.

**furyous68** · 06-30-2014, 11:57 AM

Originally posted by gator68

If you have a trademark you have to defend it. Otherwise you just lose it.

I kind of agree, otherwise, what's the point of having a trademark system?

**bohoki** · 06-30-2014, 12:53 PM

where is the offending ad?

Daniel Defense sues Remington