It was registered before the 89 ban. If I add a bullet button, can it be transferred in Cali?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of a preban Bushmaster M17
Collapse
X
-
Transfer of a preban Bushmaster M17
Tags: None -
The first year for the Bushmaster version of this rifle was in 1992.
My take is that they are Cali legal with a bullet button.
Smarter folks than me will be along shortly to add legal knowledge.
A few have been sold here on Calguns.
-TLast edited by Twystd1; 05-11-2014, 8:49 PM. -
-
If the gun is in California and is not registered as an assault weapon (it's prohibited by SB23) the OP is in illegal possession of it - if it doesn't have a BB + 10rd magazine.
I doubt it could be 'registered before the 89 ban', as...
(1) I think this gun was early 90s [i.e, post Roberti-Roos]
(2) any 4473/DROS paperwork done in Calif. before 2000 is irrelevant
(3) it would have had to have been specially registered in CA as an AW in 2000 regardless of any dealer paperwork.
You should put a BulletButton maglock on it ASAP to reduce felony risk.
Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA
CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
sigpic
No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,497
Posts: 25,148,388
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,908
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 14677 users online. 136 members and 14541 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment