Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

AB1563

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1
    blazeaglory
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2011
    • 6370

    AB1563

    Since I am unable to post in the political section for the most trivial reason, I am forced to ask this here.

    If the supreme court recently ruled that states need to be shall issue, why did this bill fail? How could certain counties still be using the tired old system? Isn't what they are doing illegal now? Please forgive my ignorance.
    A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

    Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.
    Tags: None
    • #2
      cannon
      In Memoriam
      • Aug 2008
      • 8589
      The United States Supreme Court made no such ruling.

      A petit panel of the ninth circuit did.
      ^^ Said by some lunatic on the internet

        Comment

        • #3
          blazeaglory
          Calguns Addict
          • May 2011
          • 6370
          Originally posted by cannon
          The United States Supreme Court made no such ruling.

          A petit panel of the ninth circuit did.
          Doesnt CA still have to abide by their ruling? I really dont understand. Does the ruling not have any teeth or what? Or is the CA legislature waiting for a more controlling Democrat authored bill for concealed carry?
          A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

          Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.

            Comment

            • #4
              Librarian
              Admin and Poltergeist
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Oct 2005
              • 44697
              Even if you can't post in those forums, you certainly can read the Peruta threads. You might have to log out first ...
              ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

              Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                Comment

                • #5
                  blazeaglory
                  Calguns Addict
                  • May 2011
                  • 6370
                  Originally posted by Librarian
                  Even if you can't post in those forums, you certainly can read the Peruta threads. You might have to log out first ...
                  Ill try but I think I was reading them earlier. Usually Im pretty up to date on the bills and can figure them out but for some reason this one eludes me.

                  Is it that CA will eventually adopt a CCW bill and the Dems didnt like the easiness of this one? Or will we stay in this same stupid system regardless of the 9th circuit ruling? Seems like certain county sherrifs and what not are breaking the law?
                  A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

                  Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.

                    Comment

                    • #6
                      blazeaglory
                      Calguns Addict
                      • May 2011
                      • 6370
                      OK. I kind of get it now...

                      So, if certain county sherrifs continue down the same path of "may issue" they will be opening themselves up to lawsuits, regardless of what CA law says now correct?
                      A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

                      Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.

                        Comment

                        • #7
                          Librarian
                          Admin and Poltergeist
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 44697
                          Try this article from Michel & Assoc -- http://michellawyers.com/2014/nra-vi...rnia-ccw-case/
                          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next

                            Calguns.net Statistics

                            Collapse
                            Topics: 1,870,561   Posts: 25,173,546   Members: 358,862   Active Members: 5,355
                            Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.

                            What's Going On

                            Collapse

                            There are currently 20985 users online. 151 members and 20834 guests.

                            Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1