Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Want Gov. Mandated Safety Electronics?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottsBad
    Progressives Suck!
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • May 2009
    • 5610

    Want Gov. Mandated Safety Electronics?

    We've seen Holder suggest that the DOJ (ATF) is in favor of moving to requiring guns that can only be fired by the owner. Is this a safety move or is there another reason?

    1. Guns that have electronic RF interlocks that will disable them could potentially be disabled by a third party. With a jammer or with backdoor electronic circuitry.

    2. Gun with this technology may include an RFID device with a serial number. This could be accessed by devices that scan crowds and potentially match them to backend data bases.

    These are hypothetical, but likely trends given our ever more intrusive Government and their penchant for increasing surveillance and control.

    So do you favor the safety interlocks suggested by Eric Holder?
    sigpicC'mon man, shouldn't we ban Democracks from Cal-Guns? Or at least send them to re-education camps.
  • #2
    RuskieShooter
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 468

    Originally posted by ScottsBad
    So do you favor the safety interlocks suggested by Eric Holder?
    No. My HD firearms need to be accessible by multiple people (wife and daughter). The best description I heard was "Would you want a fire extinguisher in your kitchen that only you could operate?".

    Also, as a EE I know how unreliable electronics can be. I want as few complications on something that may need to save my life as possible.

    -Ruskie
    The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed - where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.

    -Hon. Alex Kozinski (Silvera v Lockyer, 2003)

    Comment

    • #3
      Rainbow Warrior
      Banned
      • Apr 2010
      • 10501

      Uh no.

      Comment

      • #4
        sl0re10
        Calguns Addict
        • Jan 2013
        • 7242

        nope... and no tracking computer in my car either.

        Comment

        • #5
          truthseeker
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2008
          • 1546

          Uh no, because .gov will make a backdoor so that they can turn off ANY firearm with that technology whenever they feel like it.
          sigpic

          Comment

          • #6
            Lifeon2whls
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2011
            • 1751

            Whats with all of the rhetorical posts lately? Might as well ask us if we want to put a picture of Feinstein above all our beds and call it birth control.

            Comment

            • #7
              Rainbow Warrior
              Banned
              • Apr 2010
              • 10501

              Originally posted by Lifeon2whls
              Whats with all of the rhetorical posts lately? Might as well ask us if we want to put a picture of Feinstein above all our beds and call it birth control.
              That could work.

              Comment

              • #8
                ScottsBad
                Progressives Suck!
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • May 2009
                • 5610

                Originally posted by Lifeon2whls
                Whats with all of the rhetorical posts lately? Might as well ask us if we want to put a picture of Feinstein above all our beds and call it birth control.
                Trying to get people to think about what electronics in a gun can mean. I'm really concerned about the Government's ability to hack into or turn electronic devices against us.

                I've heard folks on this forum argue that the electronics used in a gun to make it safer is not such a bad idea.
                sigpicC'mon man, shouldn't we ban Democracks from Cal-Guns? Or at least send them to re-education camps.

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1