Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

This is what California is afraid of -->>

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gunnut714
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 1015

    This is what California is afraid of -->>

    By Jennifer Dobner BUNKERVILLE, Nevada (Reuters) - U.S. officials ended a stand-off with hundreds of armed protesters in the Nevada desert on Saturday, calling off the government's roundup of cattle i...


    here is another article, but from a more conservative source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...cmp=latestnews


    This is what liberal politicians of California is afraid of. Armed militia trying to defend against aggression by the federal government. I'm not saying the rancher is innocent (since he does technically owe the federal government money for grazing his cattle), but when the government tries to take 1,000 of your cows, you have to fight back. Any of our calgunners go to this event? The article says a few from California showed up in support of the militia.

    Side note: Some sources say the land originally belong to the Bundy family, but the federal government took away their rights to protect a endangered tortoise species. Also, apparently the government is trying to build a massive solar farm on that same land.
    Last edited by gunnut714; 04-13-2014, 3:41 AM.
  • #2
    Rockit
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 1337

    R...

    Comment

    • #3
      Lifeon2whls
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 1751

      The interesting thing about this is that the government backed down to pressure from an armed militia. Typically when anything like this happens, they go through "lessons learned" and try to enact some new policy so this type of thing doesn't happen again. I don't see them simply turning around and tucking tail. "Militia" gatherings are already illegal in many places and I wouldn't be surprised if those types of laws are expanded and/or people who were at this event face repercussions. This may even trigger some kind of national firearms law that prevents things like this from happening. Liberals aren't the only people who are afraid of this...if you thing conservatives are innocent of trying to exert their power on the people then you need to wake up. This is a wake up call for both sides and it may be much easier for them to come to an agreement on what needs to be done.

      Comment

      • #4
        phase1
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 1753

        the guys cattle was grazing on federal land in the middle of nowhere, on grass that no one cares about, but they want him to pay over 1mil ... lol
        Originally posted by Intimid8tor
        I don't need one but I might need one.

        Comment

        • #5
          Ronin2
          Banned
          • Jan 2011
          • 5563

          Originally posted by gunnut714
          http://news.yahoo.com/u-agency-ends-...6278.html?vp=1

          here is another article, but from a more conservative source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...cmp=latestnews


          This is what liberal politicians of California is afraid of. Armed militia trying to defend against aggression by the federal government. I'm not saying the rancher is innocent (since he does technically owe the federal government money for grazing his cattle), but when the government tries to take 1,000 of your cows, you have to fight back. Any of our calgunners go to this event? The article says a few from California showed up in support of the militia.
          Yup. The politburo in Sacramento is terrified of both your point above and the threat of armed citizens refusing to to go quietly into serfdom and rebelling wholesale.


          Originally posted by gunnut714
          Side note: Some sources say the land originally belong to the Bundy family, but the federal government took away their rights to protect a endangered tortoise species. Also, apparently the government is trying to build a massive solar farm on that same land.

          Not quite correct. The land is federal BLM land used by the buddy's for many decades. Some would say that this in effect created an easement in favor of the Bundys.

          HOWEVER, the issue is that the Feds want to build a huge solar farm in Nevada, but NOT on this land. What the Feds want this land for is "wildlife habitat mitigation". They want to relocate all the desert tortoises impacted by their solar farm to the land used by the Bundys cattle ranching operation. That would make the Bundy lands "tortoise habitat" and off limits to ranching/ cattle ( non indigenous species).

          Hope that helps..

          Comment

          • #6
            pterrell
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            • Aug 2013
            • 3576

            Ironic how they've been killing a bunch of the tortoises because they don't have enough money yet they show up with a small army. Wonder where their budgeting priorities are really at?
            Dear ISIS, Texas is not known for their gun free zones.


            Patches sold here. I am not affiliated with this page in any way.

            Comment

            • #7
              El Toro
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              CGN Contributor
              • Mar 2011
              • 1406

              Theyre not afraid. Theyre getting ready...anyone want a MRAP for a $1?
              Western civilization represents the pinnacle of true human progress, and we should rightly be proud of it, delusional leftists be damned.

              We know it's the family and the church not government officials who know best how to create strong and loving communities. And above all else we know this, in America, we don't worship government, we worship God.
              President Donald J. Trump, Oct. 13, 2017

              Comment

              • #8
                1bulletBarney
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Oct 2013
                • 1913

                Originally posted by Lifeon2whls
                The interesting thing about this is that the government backed down to pressure from an armed militia. Typically when anything like this happens, they go through "lessons learned" and try to enact some new policy so this type of thing doesn't happen again. I don't see them simply turning around and tucking tail. "Militia" gatherings are already illegal in many places and I wouldn't be surprised if those types of laws are expanded and/or people who were at this event face repercussions. This may even trigger some kind of national firearms law that prevents things like this from happening. Liberals aren't the only people who are afraid of this...if you thing conservatives are innocent of trying to exert their power on the people then you need to wake up. This is a wake up call for both sides and it may be much easier for them to come to an agreement on what needs to be done.
                If a shot is fired, the aftermath will not end well for our 2A RKBA. The Dems/Repuks would unite and unleash the power of the pen then we all lose...
                NRA Member
                NRA-ILA Contributor
                CGN Contributor

                iTrader Feedback
                1bulletBarney iTrader Feedback - Calguns.net?

                Comment

                • #9
                  Ronin2
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 5563

                  Originally posted by El Toro
                  Theyre not afraid. Theyre getting ready...anyone want a MRAP for a $1?
                  Ill see your MRAP and raise you an M75 APC....

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    teg33
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2013
                    • 3441

                    Wow, Federal gov acting as cattle rustler. Isn't a crime to steal cattle?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      farmerjoe
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 1014

                      Wonder when the Feds will break down and go after Al Sharpton


                      The Rev. Al Sharpton’s community organizing group is in desperate financial straits, new research suggests.

                      The left-wing National Action Network Inc., headquartered in New York City’s Harlem neighborhood, owes at least $1,556,059 in federal taxes and $108,489 in New York taxes, according to the Nexis tax liens database. Tax agencies typically file tax liens only after taxes have become significantly overdue and other collection methods have failed.



                      Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/24/al...#ixzz2ynHVqzC5


                      Double Standard, or what?
                      Don't know your California Legislators Number?

                      http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        fiddletown
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 4928

                        Originally posted by teg33
                        Wow, Federal gov acting as cattle rustler. Isn't a crime to steal cattle?
                        Actually this is more about the Bundy's theft from us (the public at large) of grazing rights.

                        BLM leases land use to ranchers for cattle grazing for a nominal fee. That land (BLM lands) belong to all of us, and are for public use! Plus BLM has the right to revoke grazing rights for violations or non-payment.

                        Bundy has not paid the required grazing fees and has lost in court multiple times trying to fight it.

                        As pointed out in this article:
                        ...In removing Bundy's livestock from public lands, the park service and land bureau are carrying out two U.S. District Court orders from two different judges.

                        "Cattle have been grazing in trespass on public lands in Southern Nevada for more than two decades," the National Park Service said. "The BLM and NPS have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. Impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is an option of last resort."

                        Added the BLM: "Mr. Bundy has also failed to comply with multiple court orders to remove his cattle from the federal lands and to end the illegal trespass."...

                        Bundy stopped paying grazing fees in 1993 and now owes the United States (that's all of us) more than $1 Million in unpaid grazing fees.

                        Folks need to learn to do some actual research before spouting off.
                        "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          flyingcaveman
                          Junior Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 78

                          Except the situation in California is worse. We've banned any open carry, so there will be no 'show-of-force' stage. It doesn't make any sense to go protest, get tazed arrested and your guns taken away. The state forced a situation where any battles will either be fought underground or right to the shooting stage as soon as you step out your front door.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            teg33
                            Veteran Member
                            • May 2013
                            • 3441

                            Originally posted by fiddletown
                            Actually this is more about the Bundy's theft from us (the public at large) of grazing rights.

                            BLM leases land use to ranchers for cattle grazing for a nominal fee. That land (BLM lands) belong to all of us, and are for public use! Plus BLM has the right to revoke grazing rights for violations or non-payment.

                            Bundy has not paid the required grazing fees and has lost in court multiple times trying to fight it.

                            As pointed out in this article:
                            Bundy stopped paying grazing fees in 1993 and now owes the United States (that's all of us) more than $1 Million in unpaid grazing fees.

                            Folks need to learn to do some actual research before spouting off.
                            So what's the reason Bundy failed/refused pay the fees?

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              fiddletown
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 4928

                              Originally posted by teg33
                              So what's the reason Bundy failed/refused pay the fees?

                              Beats me. But the courts have determined that he was legally obligated to pay the fees and that he was not legally entitled to graze his cattle on public lands without paying the fees and that he is not legally entitled to continue to graze his cattle on public lands.

                              So the bottom line appears to be that he is trying to do by force what the courts have said he may not lawfully do.
                              "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1