Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Gunowners Beware: No-knock SWAT Attacks

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CPRAFAN
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 1260

    Gunowners Beware: No-knock SWAT Attacks

    Gun owners beware. Squirt gun owners, that includes you. If a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team SUSPECTS you of crime, you may receive a late-night visit from an armed SWAT team.


    "Swatting" is a new pastime for angry neighbors and ex-girlfriends - you are an anonymous phone call away from a SWAT raid busting in your door . . . .
  • #2
    TruEdge
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 1672

    Scary stuff. Typical shoot first ask questions later.
    The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria)"

    Comment

    • #3
      tonyxcom
      Calguns Addict
      • Aug 2011
      • 6397

      I have a no soliciting sign on my front door so I am good.

      Comment

      • #4
        sealocan
        Calguns Addict
        • Mar 2012
        • 9949

        no soliciting signs = no selling and they don't stop salesman and I'm pretty sure they're not going to work with a SWAT team,
        but who knows, maybe.
        :-)

        I'm going to stick with my home made warning sign :
        " this house is contaminated with Calgunitis !!! extremely contagious!.. we're talking worse than Fighterpilots basement! bad stuff! stay away! "


        but on a serious note, this gets worse and worse as I get older.
        I'm almost become too cynical and believe they've got the secret formula for turning up the heat very slowly & cooking the frog without the frog getting upset and causing a commotion...

        The bad news is, we are the frog.
        Last edited by sealocan; 03-24-2014, 9:54 AM.

        Comment

        • #5
          emptybottle151
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 1503

          sigpic

          Comment

          • #6
            DTOM CA!
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 1060

            No knock warrants are really no different IMO. The regular "knock" warrants are knock twice, yell police and knock down the door. It takes 1-2 seconds to be inside so either way makes no "real" difference. If I was a bad guy that did home invasion robberies I would knock down the door and yell "Police" so anyone inside would hesitate to defend themselves until it was to late. It is scarey times !

            Comment

            • #7
              Jimi Jah
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2014
              • 18415

              This is a result of the militarization of the local police forces. One city gets a military assault vehicle and the next city wants one too.

              SWAT teams are used for every day police work, only because they have those assets and must use them to justify having them.

              Someone in law enforcement will need to explain to me why a SWAT team is needed for a domestic police call. What are they expecting to find, Osama?

              Comment

              • #8
                TruEdge
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 1672

                Originally posted by DTOM CA!
                No knock warrants are really no different IMO. The regular "knock" warrants are knock twice, yell police and knock down the door. It takes 1-2 seconds to be inside so either way makes no "real" difference. If I was a bad guy that did home invasion robberies I would knock down the door and yell "Police" so anyone inside would hesitate to defend themselves until it was to late. It is scarey times !
                Sounds like you have experience doing home invasions
                The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria)"

                Comment

                • #9
                  Antagon3
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 722

                  Didn't a SWAT officer take a few rounds and die in one of these dumbass raids? What's that saying about playing stupid games?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    The Gleam
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 12157

                    Originally posted by CPRAFAN
                    "Swatting" is a new pastime for angry neighbors and ex-girlfriends - you are an anonymous phone call away from a SWAT raid busting in your door . . . .
                    New? It's been going on now for at least the past 3 years. Really ramped up in 2013 and has started to die down recently, but may pick up in popularity in other states. CA passed a bill last year strengthening punitive damages for those caught doing it.

                    Regardless, this country needs to take a huge step back in militarizing its police forces, especially when in most all cases, a simple knock on the door and standard procedure at a normal hour (and not in the middle of the night) would not only suffice, but not be chaotic or result in a disastrous end.

                    We are going down the same path as a 1933 Germany, while voting for it, cultivating it, supporting it, and allowing it.
                    Last edited by The Gleam; 03-24-2014, 10:43 AM.
                    -----------------------------------------------
                    Originally posted by Librarian
                    What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                    If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Rickrock1
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Jan 2012
                      • 5158

                      Bring out the battering ram
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        navin r
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 774

                        Originally posted by The Gleam
                        New? It's been going on now for at least the past 3 years. Really ramped up in 2013 and has started to die down recently, but may pick up in popularity in other states. CA passed a bill last year strengthening punitive damages for those caught doing it.

                        Regardless, this country needs to take a huge step back in militarizing its police forces, especially when in most all cases, a simple knock on the door and standard procedure at a normal hour (and not in the middle of the night) would not only suffice, but not be chaotic or result in a disastrous end.

                        We are going down the same path as a 1933 Germany, while voting for it, cultivating it, supporting it, and allowing it.
                        This. Well said, thank you.
                        NRA life member CRPA life member

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          klewan
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 3031

                          Originally posted by The Gleam
                          New? It's been going on now for at least the past 3 years. Really ramped up in 2013 and has started to die down recently, but may pick up in popularity in other states. CA passed a bill last year strengthening punitive damages for those caught doing it.

                          Regardless, this country needs to take a huge step back in militarizing its police forces, especially when in most all cases, a simple knock on the door and standard procedure at a normal hour (and not in the middle of the night) would not only suffice, but not be chaotic or result in a disastrous end.

                          We are going down the same path as a 1933 Germany, while voting for it, cultivating it, supporting it, and allowing it.
                          The conservative blogger, Patterico, was the first one I knew about getting "swatted". There was a real run on crazies calling 911 and reporting a shooting, kidnapping, or some other violent crime. He was reporting them on his blog, and there were a couple that were this >< close to getting shot.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            morfeeis
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 7605

                            Originally posted by DTOM CA!
                            No knock warrants are really no different IMO. The regular "knock" warrants are knock twice, yell police and knock down the door. It takes 1-2 seconds to be inside so either way makes no "real" difference. If I was a bad guy that did home invasion robberies I would knock down the door and yell "Police" so anyone inside would hesitate to defend themselves until it was to late. It is scarey times !
                            How bad is it that i have thought about that a many of times, what if a scum bag breaks in and yells Police! God forbid i should ever face such a situation but my idea would be to take cover and ask for the warrant to be shown before coming out. that would make sense when dealing with "thinking people" but 9/10 the leo would just shoot me for challenging their authority.
                            ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
                            Originally posted by Ayn Rand
                            You seek escape from pain. We seek the achievement of happiness. You exist for the sake of avoiding punishment. We exist for the sake of earning rewards. Threats will not make us function; fear is not our incentive. It is not death we wish to avoid, but life that we wish to live.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Custom ii
                              Member
                              • Apr 2013
                              • 319

                              It amazes me how the rules of engagement are much more stringent in a war zone such as Afghanistan than they are with law enforcement in a free republic. The sad state of affairs in this once great country. I still believe this is the greatest country on earth but the divide that creates the difference between us and them is shrinking fast.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1