So I have been pondering this in theory and I am not good with California confusing gun laws, but could you put a Tapco stock on a SKS and still be California compliant? Given that the SKS has a ten round non removable box, why would it be any different than a AR with the fixed magazine. As long as it was 922r compliant, would it be legal?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKS Compliant?
Collapse
X
-
There is no (California) legal reason you couldn't do that, but remember that every time someone puts a Tapco stock on an SKS, God kills a kitten.
The one weird thing about the SKS is it can't have a detachable magazine. It is singled out for this.Originally posted by cockedandglockedGetting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill. -
Thank you for the reply and there are plenty more kittens out there. If the SKS in questioned was a no refurbish, non shooter type then yes I would agree, but if I am going for Bubba of the year then yes a Tapco will will be fine. Just need more length of pull on the stock. My arms are too long for the standard configuration.Comment
-
922(r) has to be followed when replacing parts.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using TapatalkOppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison
The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)Comment
-
Yes indeed it does. That is why Tapco has a good reference for what to think about with replacement of parts. The common misconception is three. It is actually no more than 10 foreign parts. (I know I had the misconception) Hence why I want to ask if you could put the stock on in California.
27 CFR 478.39 - ASSEMBLY OF NON-SPORTING SHOTGUNS AND SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES FROM IMPORTED PARTS
(a) No person shall assemble a semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun using more than 10 of the imported parts listed in paragraph (c) of this section if the assembled firearm is prohibited from importation under section 925(d)(3) as not being particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to:
(1) The assembly of such rifle or shotgun for sale or distribution by a licensed manufacturer to the United States or any department or agency thereof or to any State or any department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or
(2) The assembly of such rifle or shotgun for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Director under the provisions of Sec. 178.151; or
(3) The repair of any rifle or shotgun which had been imported into or assembled in the United States prior to November 30, 1990, or the replacement of any part of such firearm.
(c) For purposes of this section, the term imported parts are:
(1) Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings or stampings
(2) Barrels
(3) Barrel extensions
(4) Mounting blocks (trunions)
(5) Muzzle attachments
(6) Bolts
(7) Bolt carriers
(8) Operating rods
(9) Gas pistons
(10) Trigger housings
(11) Triggers
(12) Hammers
(13) Sears
(14) Disconnectors
(15) Butt stocks
(16) Pistol grips
(17) Forearms, hand guards
(18) Magazine bodies
(19) Followers
(20) Floor plates
(Taken from Tapco 922r Compliance Section.)Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,339
Posts: 25,129,435
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,903
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 16758 users online. 17 members and 16741 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment