WTF?!Nope...I was wrong Nevermind..oops..sorry

[Bangzoom]

Ok i remember he mentioned Mauser...then a minute later he said Model 1897

he was talking about the ONLY long gun i sold this year...It was so close to the day I had to check my records..i thought he was talking about 2 separate rifles


My bad...sorry guys

But on the bright side he could not find the Taurus I bought at a dealer years ago

[Artema]

They're registered. Why wouldn't they have this information?

[CSACANNONEER]

TAGGED. This sounds illegal.

[jarhead714]

Buy and trade within the neighborhood holmes.

[Cool Custard]

[The Gleam]

TAGGED. This sounds illegal.

I agree. Because while DOJ may be able to keep such DROS records filed, general law enforcement is not supposed to be able to access that information so candidly, electronically, etc., save for RAWs. The whole intent was that this general DROS information and purchases would not be revealed when running license plates, Drivers License, etc. on a whim, broadcast over telecom - or so easily as seems to have been the case here.

Does applying for a CCW give them the allowance for that access?

Something is NOT right with that.

[Bangzoom]

They're registered. Why wouldn't they have this information?

so the mauser i sold last year was registered???

[bruss01]

When you say "all the guns" is it fair to assume that this is exclusively handguns?

The state maintains a registry of handguns, so it's not surprising they would have access to their own registry.

Now, if he started rattling off the serial numbers of your 10/22, your shotgun, etc... I'd have to wonder where that info was coming from. That is supposed to be confidential and not even known to the feds unless they actually go to the FFL looking for a specific gun's history.

[Ninety]

they will have any newly aquirred long guns too.
Sent from an electronic tracking device

[Bangzoom]

When you say "all the guns" is it fair to assume that this is exclusively handguns?

The state maintains a registry of handguns, so it's not surprising they would have access to their own registry.

Now, if he started rattling off the serial numbers of your 10/22, your shotgun, etc... I'd have to wonder where that info was coming from. That is supposed to be confidential and not even known to the feds unless they actually go to the FFL looking for a specific gun's history.

no he started verbally listing some long guns i sold last year...then i heard him mumbling as he read the "long list" keywords that fit PPT i have done..he said "mauser"... "bolt action"... "model 1897"

[afteractionreport]

Wo..sounds bad....

[El Toro]

Go back and non-chalantly ask him for a print out. If possible snap a pucture of his screen. Not that I dont believe you but there is no proof it showed all yor transactions and heresay wont hold up in court. Better to get some proof that LE has access to a registry.

[Bangzoom]

Let me check my records...He may have only mentioned the ONLY long gun I sold this year...i did sell many pistols

sorry if I am wrong...im wrong at least once a day

[Artema]

no he started verbally listing some long guns i sold last year...then i heard him mumbling as he read the "long list" keywords that fit PPT i have done..he said "mauser"... "bolt action"... "model 1897"

Wow, that would be interesting. Unless it happened this year.

[bruss01]

they will have any newly aquirred long guns too.

Correct, if you've been out wheeling and dealing in long guns after the first of the year already (we're what, 8-9 weeks into the new year?) then those transactions are going to be in the system as well.

Now you know why they wanted them all in one big slush-pot, available on demand day and night at a moment's notice, with but a few little keystrokes.