Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

27-2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stroupdr
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 37

    27-2

    Went to my local pawn shop yesterday and saw a nice 27-2 with 4 inch and they told me they could nice sell it to me unless I was law enforcement , is this true? Thanks Dave
  • #2
    opie4386
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 1336

    Probably not on the roster of safe handguns in CA

    Comment

    • #3
      c good
      Veteran Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 2705

      It's not on roster but I think the Single Action Exemption still exists. (hope this didn't get axed for 2014) Shop could pull out the double action part and sell it to you in Single action form. What you do with the part after purchase is up to you.

      Comment

      • #4
        The Gleam
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2011
        • 13304

        -----------------------------------------------
        Originally posted by Librarian
        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

        Comment

        • #5
          JDay
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Nov 2008
          • 19393

          Single action revolvers are roster exempt.

          Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
          Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

          The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1