Tweet
I did a few ppt's there over the past year or so and for the most part they were adequate enough...nothing to write home about but their services sufficed. The older guys seem helpful enough. I went there for a ppt recently and we approached the sale counter to start the paperwork as usual. The counter-commander got all bent out of shape and started to holler at us as he ripped the gun from our case (sans mag) to rack it back for safety check. I understand that there are safety measures but if the guidelines have changed recently, signages at the door might be helpful before this kind of decorum ensues. Anyhoo, that's not the worst part.
After calming down from his A.D.D. fit, the commando started to grill our fellow calgunner about where and how he got the pistol. Are you LEO? Former LEO? Moved from another state recently? You know that the pistol is not on the list for at least 2 years right? The barrages continued to no end...caught off guard, we just stared at each other and mouthed WTF as we circle jerked each other (lol). Again, after calming down from his second A.D.D. petit mal, he came back and finished up his rant by stating: "it doesn't mean I won't do your ppt but there's a chance that DOJ might confiscate this...I know as I was a former affiliate of DOJ."
Now, let's not bull**** a bull****ter...if you were DOJ and currently employed by a lgs, the question of why comes to mind readily. Besides, I too was an affiliate of Pete Wilson and the governator...when I was a phone solicitor so you see the point. The dude even added: technically he can't ppt the pistol unless there's a mag with it. My FUD alarm was so loud I couldn't think.
That's not all...what got me going was a nonchalant blanket statement that he made about our community. During the course of the conversation (if you can even label it as such), I've mentioned sse as a legal way to bring an off-list piece into CA and how a ppt would negate the list (and the current transaction would be a second ppt). His casual statement about us calgunners amounted to how we drink our own koolaid and our practices and understanding of the law is questionable at best.
It is transparent that this individual will more than likely deny this but I hope he and the owner of FT will see this post. As most of the above may only equate to subjectivism, I thank you for letting me ***** a bit. As for my business with FT, I doubt that there will a subsequent one.
After calming down from his A.D.D. fit, the commando started to grill our fellow calgunner about where and how he got the pistol. Are you LEO? Former LEO? Moved from another state recently? You know that the pistol is not on the list for at least 2 years right? The barrages continued to no end...caught off guard, we just stared at each other and mouthed WTF as we circle jerked each other (lol). Again, after calming down from his second A.D.D. petit mal, he came back and finished up his rant by stating: "it doesn't mean I won't do your ppt but there's a chance that DOJ might confiscate this...I know as I was a former affiliate of DOJ."
Now, let's not bull**** a bull****ter...if you were DOJ and currently employed by a lgs, the question of why comes to mind readily. Besides, I too was an affiliate of Pete Wilson and the governator...when I was a phone solicitor so you see the point. The dude even added: technically he can't ppt the pistol unless there's a mag with it. My FUD alarm was so loud I couldn't think.
That's not all...what got me going was a nonchalant blanket statement that he made about our community. During the course of the conversation (if you can even label it as such), I've mentioned sse as a legal way to bring an off-list piece into CA and how a ppt would negate the list (and the current transaction would be a second ppt). His casual statement about us calgunners amounted to how we drink our own koolaid and our practices and understanding of the law is questionable at best.
It is transparent that this individual will more than likely deny this but I hope he and the owner of FT will see this post. As most of the above may only equate to subjectivism, I thank you for letting me ***** a bit. As for my business with FT, I doubt that there will a subsequent one.
Comment