What are the legal ramifications of building an AR utilizing an 80% finished lower receiver?
Since these receivers are not finished, they are not considered firearms by definition and they can be purchased without a FFL check I would assume that one wishing to be California Compliant would build one with the required bullet button to stay within the rules of a California compliant AR's.
I personally believe in staying within the law as it exists and effecting change through the legal system to change the laws I disagree with. California is, of course, a tough state for pro 2nd amendment advocates but breaking the law only gives the anti 2nd amendment crowd more ammo.
What are the issues with building your own unregistered rifle, under these circumstances, as of January 1st, 20014?
Is it legal for a California resident to build a rifle such as this in this state?
Does one need to have it serialized and DROS it?
I don't have one but I am interested in the subject since first hearing about 80% lowers at a local gunshop recently.
Thanks!
Since these receivers are not finished, they are not considered firearms by definition and they can be purchased without a FFL check I would assume that one wishing to be California Compliant would build one with the required bullet button to stay within the rules of a California compliant AR's.
I personally believe in staying within the law as it exists and effecting change through the legal system to change the laws I disagree with. California is, of course, a tough state for pro 2nd amendment advocates but breaking the law only gives the anti 2nd amendment crowd more ammo.
What are the issues with building your own unregistered rifle, under these circumstances, as of January 1st, 20014?
Is it legal for a California resident to build a rifle such as this in this state?
Does one need to have it serialized and DROS it?
I don't have one but I am interested in the subject since first hearing about 80% lowers at a local gunshop recently.
Thanks!


Comment