http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-cont...06/07-2901.pdf for a full read.
Essentially they said that requiring registration for, keeping unloaded, and keeping a handgun locked was not feasible to use a handgun as home defense and took away our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. They went into depth and said that certain types of firearms are still restricted to NFA items, and from what I read did not really take a stance on CCW outside of the home. but they still affirmed what the District Court found, albeit more in depth.
Essentially they said that requiring registration for, keeping unloaded, and keeping a handgun locked was not feasible to use a handgun as home defense and took away our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. They went into depth and said that certain types of firearms are still restricted to NFA items, and from what I read did not really take a stance on CCW outside of the home. but they still affirmed what the District Court found, albeit more in depth.



Comment