Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

VISA ban gun purchases

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #2
    riderr
    Calguns Addict
    • Sep 2013
    • 6632

    All firearm related transactions will be processed by their competitors now. Also, the gun owners will be less likely using Visa for other purchases. So, Visa is hurting its own business.

    Comment

    • #3
      kurac
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 2917

      let them fall on their own sword.
      www.culinagrips.com
      "custom grips for shooters by shooters"

      Comment

      • #4
        Ninask
        Banned
        • Aug 2013
        • 1029

        That's f* up

        Comment

        • #5
          Montu
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 1589

          Well, I'll be sure to use discover instead (you can also get cash back on cgf donations)
          K.F.K|Μολὼν λαβέ

          Comment

          • #6
            JustEd
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 988

            Not clear about the scope of this yet, but what if you have a NRA VISA card?

            nraaccounts.com is a unique domain name offered. Ideal for financial services and NRA-related businesses.
            "I think, therefore some people make me laugh"

            Comment

            • #7
              penguin0123
              Veteran Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 3089

              Anyone know how Amex stand on 2A?

              Comment

              • #8
                The Gleam
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2011
                • 12407

                Is it actually VISA or the bank sponsoring a particular VISA as a backing counterpart or for some other reason of that particular retailer? The article indicates it is a company called "Authorize.Net LLC" not VISA itself. That would be no different than Paypal doing the same, though they allow and work with VISA on payment processing, and likely have a working contract, they are not VISA.

                VISA itself has never gotten involved politically in blocking payments for any reason, and I used a VISA card just yesterday on a firearm purchase. No issues.

                I tend to think there is more to the story here than being revealed, no different than the many "Bank of America" or "JP Morgan Chase" stories that pop up claiming they are Anti-2nd Amendment, and then it turns out it's either a single anal-pinching employee on a petty-authority trip, or other problems reveal credit or fraud issues with the person/retailer making the claim, having nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment or firearms business.

                I would also like to know how "Authorize.Net LLC" which is likely no different than a credit-card processing service such as Paypal is in any way considered "VISA" the actual credit bureau.
                Last edited by The Gleam; 09-29-2013, 11:40 AM.
                -----------------------------------------------
                Originally posted by Librarian
                What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                Comment

                • #9
                  blazeaglory
                  Calguns Addict
                  • May 2011
                  • 6370

                  I think its the gateway "authorize.net" that has the problem, not Visa.

                  Simply, the gun store can use another gateway service. Or whatever they are called
                  A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

                  Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    HOGLEG
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 913

                    Authorize.Net Services is owned by Visa. Authorize.Net Services is the gateway service that processes the sale for store owners. It's Authorize.Net Services that says they will not process firearms purchases.

                    So technically since Visa owns Authorize.Net Services, Visa is responsible for the policy. Visa also contributed $20,000 to the Obama campaign.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      blazeaglory
                      Calguns Addict
                      • May 2011
                      • 6370

                      Originally posted by HOGLEG
                      Authorize.Net Services is owned by Visa. Authorize.Net Services is the gateway service that processes the sale for store owners. It's Authorize.Net Services that says they will not process firearms purchases.

                      So technically since Visa owns Authorize.Net Services, Visa is responsible for the policy. Visa also contributed $20,000 to the Obama campaign.
                      Damn...Maybe some tight wad desk jockey scrutinizing the terms and agreements? I mean, doesnt every single store in the USA use's Visa... Including most gun stores? Why just this store I wonder?
                      A note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."

                      Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        The Gleam
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 12407

                        Originally posted by HOGLEG
                        Authorize.Net Services is owned by Visa. Authorize.Net Services is the gateway service that processes the sale for store owners. It's Authorize.Net Services that says they will not process firearms purchases.

                        So technically since Visa owns Authorize.Net Services, Visa is responsible for the policy. Visa also contributed $20,000 to the Obama campaign.
                        It's an LLC; that means it is a "limited liability corp" and likely a partnership with another entity - so who is the majority owner? VISA or the partner(s)? (I don't know - that's a question).

                        That's not saying that VISA couldn't step in to use their might to slap the partner around. (Which they should).
                        -----------------------------------------------
                        Originally posted by Librarian
                        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Dano3467
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 7381

                          I guess it's time to cut that sucker up !!

                          Oh and minimum payment + #0.01 till it's gone...

                          Mite as well generate some paper work.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Intimid8tor
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 6607

                            There is more or less to the story.

                            Retailers don't deal with mc, visa, Amex, etc. Merchants deal with a processor. Visa also isn't a credit bureau. They are a processing brand.

                            So, I am highly suspect of visa doing something. It's possible their processor has looked to end the relationship for some reason.
                            Starve the beast, move to a free state.

                            Bwiese: "You are making the assumption the law is reasonable/has rationale."

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              CWDraco
                              Banned
                              • May 2007
                              • 3359

                              Visa is accepted everywhere. Some banks that issue Visa backed cards will deny purchases they don't agree with.

                              You can't use your Visa Card issued by The Bank of the Roman Catholic Church for abortion services.

                              In the past week I have spent about $500 on gun parts all bought with my Wells Fargo Visa card.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1