So after retroactive registration takes place, I had an unnerving idea of what the liberal pukes will attempt next. Just as with your car registration, it will start with indefinite registration at $19/gun, then it will be increased from there to perhaps $50/gun @ 5 years. Eventually the end game will be I suppose $100/gun @ 1 year just like your car. Speaking of the car, why do we pay annually for that? I am not changing title on it. Why am I forced to perpetually register something that does not change possession??? They will use this reasoning (or lack thereof as demonstrated) to force you to pay annually to register your firearms. Thoughts?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A curious thought on registration
Collapse
X
-
There is that little thing called MONEY which the government loves to spend. Its all about the money.sigpic
NRA Lifetime Member SAF Lifetime Member -
You pay an annual fee on your vehicle license & registration to help pay for the public roads that you drive on.
As far for your purposed idea regarding charging annually for firearm registration, that would be shot down as a 2nd amendment violation due to pricing of an already owned firearm out of the reach of the disadvantaged population (DC Vs. Heller would cover this).
Keep in mind that driving a vehicle is not a right it's a privilege and the state does not run any public ranges which they maintain.Last edited by baz152; 07-22-2013, 10:51 AM.Comment
-
Don't be so sure...You pay an annual fee on your vehicle license & registration to help pay for the public roads that you drive on.
As far for your purposed idea regarding charging annually for firearm registration, that would be shot down as a 4th amendment violation due to pricing of an already owned firearm out of the reach of the disadvantaged population (DC Vs. Heller would cover this).
Keep in mind that driving a vehicle is not a right it's a privilege and the state does not run any public ranges which they maintain.
THE CITY’S HEFTY $340 fee for a gun permit is constitutional, a judge declared Monday. Gun advocates claimed the fee to keep a legal gun in the home — $340 initially and for a renewal every three years — violated the…
$340 every 3 years was ruled constitutional.There is no justification for the public servant police to be more heavily armed than the law-abiding public they serve...Unless...the government's intention is to be more powerful than the people.Comment
-
Most of he roads I drive on are full of pot holes and have needed to be maintained for years, it seems that my vehicle registration fees are being used for something else..You pay an annual fee on your vehicle license & registration to help pay for the public roads that you drive on.
As far for your purposed idea regarding charging annually for firearm registration, that would be shot down as a 4th amendment violation due to pricing of an already owned firearm out of the reach of the disadvantaged population (DC Vs. Heller would cover this).
Keep in mind that driving a vehicle is not a right it's a privilege and the state does not run any public ranges which they maintain.
But the DOJ needs funding for hunting down gun owners and confiscating their guns, that is what the perpetual firearms annual registration fee will be used for.Comment
-
Well, if running a few public ranges is all it takes, the state will do it just to charge an annual fee. Of course the ranges will not be maintained, have only 2 available lanes, and a one year waiting list to use. It will also be limited to single shot .22 rifles or handguns. Because of the potential lead exposure hazard, you will also need to use a full hazmat suit. It is available for public use though.
Anyone can look around and see the damage to the state and country inflicted by bad politicians.
A vote is clearly much more dangerous than a gun.
Why advocate restrictions on one right (voting) without comparable restrictions on another (self defense) (or, why not say 'Be a U.S. citizen' as the requirement for CCW)?
--LibrarianComment
-
Which calculates to $113/year. So the argument of "oh its a right they can't do that" has been proven false. They CAN AND WILL do that. Expect it.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,567
Posts: 25,159,762
Members: 357,365
Active Members: 5,059
Welcome to our newest member, Kahiau18.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 19520 users online. 132 members and 19388 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment