Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

We need to Repeal the 19th Amendment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SilverTauron
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2012
    • 5699

    We need to Repeal the 19th Amendment

    "What works for Washington DC will not work for Chicago. As scientific studies prove,women prioritize security when evaluating political candidates. Ever since womens sufferage was passed,the government has ballooned in size.Its clear that the idea of women being disenfranchised is just anti government paranoia. Reasonable restrictions on the Right to Equal Representation just makes sense,as benchmark allies like Saudi Arabia illustrate.We don't live in the 1920s anymore,and women just do not require the same rights they had almost 100 years ago.

    I'm a firm believer in responsible voting,so stand with me against the money machine that's the feminist lobby .Repeal the 19th Amendment!"

    -A word I offer to all who cherish the Constitution.Please send this to anyone you encounter who believes America is better of without the right to keep and bear arms.
    The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be.
    The more subsidies you have, the less self reliant people will be.
    -Lao-Tzu, Tau Te Ching. 479 BCE

    The 1911 may have been in wars for 100 years, but Masetro Bartolomeo Beretta was arming the world 400 years before John Browning was ever a wet dream.
  • #2
    Norcal Industries
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 1241

    hear hear!!!

    Comment

    • #3
      bohoki
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jan 2006
      • 20815

      hysteria is real

      Comment

      • #4
        alfred1222
        Calguns Addict
        • Jan 2010
        • 7331

        Da faq?
        Originally posted by Kestryll
        This guy is a complete and total idiot.
        /thread.

        ΦΑ

        Comment

        • #5
          dsmoot
          Member
          • May 2009
          • 208

          See the problem with that thinking is that it doesn't take into consideration the other things that happened around the same time. The worst of all is the 17 amendment, direct election of senators. That is where the states lost any power and the fed government grew in size exponentially.

          Comment

          • #6
            Simply115
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 2265

            I believe the OP is trying to highlight the absurdity of anti-gunner statements.


            Comment

            • #7
              six10
              Member
              • Dec 2009
              • 463

              Originally posted by Simply115
              I believe the OP is trying to highlight the absurdity of anti-gunner statements.
              One sincerely hopes that is so...

              Comment

              • #8
                rubyist
                Junior Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 69

                10 out of 10 Taliban agree!

                Quite ironic how some of those who foam at the mouth with hatred of the Taliban share much of the same ideology.

                Comment

                • #9
                  rubyist
                  Junior Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 69

                  Mods, please remove this from "General gun discussions." This is "off-topic" at best.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    SWalt
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 8637

                    Originally posted by SilverTauron
                    "What works for Washington DC will not work for Chicago. As scientific studies prove,women prioritize security when evaluating political candidates. Ever since womens sufferage was passed,the government has ballooned in size.Its clear that the idea of women being disenfranchised is just anti government paranoia. Reasonable restrictions on the Right to Equal Representation just makes sense,as benchmark allies like Saudi Arabia illustrate.We don't live in the 1920s anymore,and women just do not require the same rights they had almost 100 years ago.

                    I'm a firm believer in responsible voting,so stand with me against the money machine that's the feminist lobby .Repeal the 19th Amendment!"

                    -A word I offer to all who cherish the Constitution.Please send this to anyone you encounter who believes America is better of without the right to keep and bear arms.
                    I do believe the bold part is the operative sentence. If it happens to the 2nd amendment, it can happen to others.

                    But I do agree the 17th did weaken the states to the point to how weak they are today.
                    ^^^The above is just an opinion.

                    NRA Patron Member
                    CRPA 5 yr Member

                    "...which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaids, by ors and by ands, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to lawyers themselves. " - Thomas Jefferson

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Lone_Gunman
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 8396

                      A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift.



                      Jonathan Swift's masterful satire, "A Modest Proposal," [mockingly!] proposes to solve the devastating poverty in Ireland by selling poor children as food for wealthy families. Swift goes on to explain how this would solve all of Ireland's problems from domestic abuse to poverty. Swift 's Projector explains his proposal in depth, in many ways treating these children as nothing more than a new type of livestock. Towards the end, however, Swift lists numerous reforms that could help the country. This list makes a change in tone. However, these reforms differ from Swift's "modest proposal" because instead of the poor sacrificing their children, it would involve the rich sacrificing some of their luxuries.

                      Have we become so illiterate that we no longer recognize satire?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1