Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Does anybody know anything about this?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rdb241
    Banned
    • Jul 2010
    • 184

    Does anybody know anything about this?

    Last edited by rdb241; 03-13-2013, 3:33 AM.
  • #2
    stix213
    AKA: Joe Censored
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2009
    • 19002

    There has to be more to the story. A single voluntary visit to the hospital doesn't make you a prohibited person for starters. Sounds like she was actually on a 5150, which is involuntary. The article says there was a nurse that wrote down the facts wrong, but she also would have got a hearing. Not sure why that doesn't come up.

    Also it says the two guns registered to the husband were rifles..... that doesn't make any sense. But maybe they just have the registration thing wrong.

    Well in the end she was prohibited after she visited a mental institution, and she continued to have access to the firearms after being prohibited. The husband should have locked up the firearms where she couldn't get access and he would have kept them I'm sure. They should have also asked for a warrant instead of just letting them do their thing (what did they think the cops were there for anyway?)

    Comment

    • #3
      philobeddoe
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2007
      • 2022

      donuts?
      ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

      NRA MEMBERSHIP


      GOA MEMBERSHIP

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1