Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know anything about this?
Collapse
X
-
There has to be more to the story. A single voluntary visit to the hospital doesn't make you a prohibited person for starters. Sounds like she was actually on a 5150, which is involuntary. The article says there was a nurse that wrote down the facts wrong, but she also would have got a hearing. Not sure why that doesn't come up.
Also it says the two guns registered to the husband were rifles..... that doesn't make any sense. But maybe they just have the registration thing wrong.
Well in the end she was prohibited after she visited a mental institution, and she continued to have access to the firearms after being prohibited. The husband should have locked up the firearms where she couldn't get access and he would have kept them I'm sure. They should have also asked for a warrant instead of just letting them do their thing (what did they think the cops were there for anyway?) -
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,869,086
Posts: 25,155,371
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,714
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 11330 users online. 45 members and 11285 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment