Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Will Colt ever make "snake" revolvers again?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jel
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 1425

    Will Colt ever make "snake" revolvers again?

    Just wondering why Colt has not revived their line of large caliber revolvers? It would seem the market is ripe for the pickings, especially now.

    Would love to see NEW Pythons, Diamondbacks, Boas, Vipers, Anacondas, Cobras and King Cobras come off their manufacturing line.

    I've heard some people say that it just costs too much to manufacture nowadays. But it would seem reasonable to think that if the market will bear it, they could price them at a point that would make it worth their while.

    Anyone have or know any good reasons?
    Last edited by Jel; 02-03-2013, 10:05 PM.
  • #2
    alfred1222
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2010
    • 7331

    I'd buy a colt pistol over a smith any day. Actually I would buy multiple colt pistols
    Originally posted by Kestryll
    This guy is a complete and total idiot.
    /thread.

    ΦΑ

    Comment

    • #3
      kurac
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 2917

      they might in name but they won't be made like they were in the past.
      www.culinagrips.com
      "custom grips for shooters by shooters"

      Comment

      • #4
        myk
        Calguns Addict
        • Sep 2012
        • 5955

        Not only that, but you can bet the price on new "snake" guns will make panic-buy prices on AR's and 'ammo seem sane...


        I don't always save the world, but when I do, it's in 24 hours or less...

        Comment

        • #5
          G-forceJunkie
          Calguns Addict
          • Jul 2010
          • 6359

          I doubt they still have the old world craftsmen to make such revolvers.

          Comment

          • #6
            Gryff
            CGSSA Coordinator
            • May 2006
            • 12686

            The hand tuning that went into the Python/Diamondback would require it to be sold for $2000-3000 today to be profitable. They could never sell a reasonable enough amount to make it worthwhile for them.
            My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

            Comment

            • #7
              penguinofsleep
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 2068

              i'd be really happy and buy a python or two if they did. hate saying this, but none of the snake guns ive seen/held/used ever felt quite "right" in my hands aside from the python. no doubt that they are very fine firearms though. i imagine if they had streamlined their processes earlier, cut a few models from the line, etc. they could still have at least the python today.

              as for labor, it seems like a lot of their 1911's already involve some degree of semi to skilled labor by individuals. i don't see how/why these same skilled laborers couldn't be trained to work on a python. while their 1911s don't have many features and may seem lacking at first glance (i know i was underwhelmed my first time), it wasn't until closer/further inspection and use that i realize that the little bit extra workmanship and quality are probably the biggest things colt 1911s have going for them (excluding some of the lemons from the 90's).
              Last edited by penguinofsleep; 02-03-2013, 11:10 PM.

              Comment

              • #8
                Merc1138
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2009
                • 19742

                I doubt that they could get production of those revolvers going again and get the price under $2,000, or be able to sell them in enough volume to get the price per unit down. Having a high cost revolver >$1000 drastically cuts down on the number of potential buyers.

                You also have to consider that the only reason the older colt revolvers go for so much, is because there aren't tons of them. Sure, they aren't really rare, but they still aren't common. Also, even if they started making new revolvers, would people be willing to pay as much for the "new" one? We know very well that it's not going to be the same staff, may not even be the same equipment or materials. Any design changes that might come along with manufacturing equipment changes would be just about guaranteed to alienate the diehard fans. Because of all of that, I don't see colt selling as many revolvers as they manage to sell 1911's, and unless it would just be a turn-key operation for them to start doing so(and we all know it isn't), it's even more unlikely to happen.

                Comment

                • #9
                  RickD427
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 9266

                  I'm with most of the above posters. The "snake" guns were real pieces of art, but the sad fact is they are probably no longer economically viable to produce.

                  The "Rattler" is probably going the be only surviving snake gun.
                  If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    SunkenShadow
                    Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 267

                    I was actually doing some reading about this not too long ago on a diff forum....with the current market being dominated by S&W mainly and Ruger, it is unlikely they will come out with a snake gun again, let alone a revolver. The only real revolver they currently have in prod is the Colt SAA (4th gen?), but the main issue is the fact that cost would be too high to produce, therefore too high to sell.
                    LASD CCW Timeline

                    12.30.21 - Application turned in at LASD HQ
                    10.03.22 - Interview Scheduled
                    10.25.22 - Interview /Live Scan
                    12.16.22 - Proceed to Training Email received
                    01.08.23 - Training Docs received
                    03.12.23 - Call for pick up appointment
                    04.07.23 - Issued

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      sigstroker
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 19675

                      Geez, you guys are way too romantic about Pythons. There was nothing all that special about them other than their looks. They used archaic leaf springs when Smith was using modern coil springs. When I was buying my first revolver, I seriously considered a Python. I believe it was less than 300 bucks at the time. I ended up buying a Dan Wesson because it was smoother than the Python. Sure I would have been money ahead with the Python had I hung onto it, but there was little or no "hand tuning" that went into it. It was no better or smoother than any other decent revolver made at the time.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Quiet
                        retired Goon
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 30242

                        During the late-1990s, when Colt decided to concentrate on Mil/Gov/LE sales only and discontinued all double-action revolvers, they ended up converting and selling off the tooling/machinery used to make them.

                        During the mid-2000s, they said it would no longer be profitable to try and restart up double-action revolver production.

                        Last double-action revolver project they were working on was the Colt Survivor.
                        sigpic

                        "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Gryff
                          CGSSA Coordinator
                          • May 2006
                          • 12686

                          Originally posted by sigstroker
                          Geez, you guys are way too romantic about Pythons. There was nothing all that special about them other than their looks. They used archaic leaf springs when Smith was using modern coil springs. When I was buying my first revolver, I seriously considered a Python. I believe it was less than 300 bucks at the time. I ended up buying a Dan Wesson because it was smoother than the Python. Sure I would have been money ahead with the Python had I hung onto it, but there was little or no "hand tuning" that went into it. It was no better or smoother than any other decent revolver made at the time.
                          I think someone handed you a Rossi and told you it was a Colt.

                          Your opinion is not going to be echoed by those who have shot both Colts and S&Ws. I will say, though, that the S&W is easier to work on, and can have superior triggers after work by a top-notch gunsmith. But the Python/Diamondback lines had the finest out-of-box triggers/actions of any American revolver that I've ever shot.
                          My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Vin63
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2012
                            • 1218

                            Originally posted by G-forceJunkie
                            I doubt they still have the old world craftsmen to make such revolvers.
                            X2...or the old tools and tooling.
                            CH3NO2

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              timmyb21
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 1814

                              Originally posted by Quiet
                              During the late-1990s, when Colt decided to concentrate on Mil/Gov/LE sales only and discontinued all double-action revolvers, they ended up converting and selling off the tooling/machinery used to make them.

                              During the mid-2000s, they said it would no longer be profitable to try and restart up double-action revolver production.

                              Last double-action revolver project they were working on was the Colt Survivor.
                              That would be AWESOME!!!! I want one.
                              sigpic

                              George Washington didn't use the 1st amendment to defeat the British...he shot them.

                              ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1