Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

response from representative Eric Sewell

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • high_revs
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2006
    • 7706

    response from representative Eric Sewell

    cut-n-paste from his email to me.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thank you for contacting me about gun safety. I always appreciate hearing from my constituents, and I am glad to receive your input on this important issue.

    I come from a family of hunters and gun owners. I know that guns can be used responsibly and the Second Amendment provides individuals certain rights to own firearms. However, as a former prosecutor whose father is a retired police officer and whose younger brother currently serves in law enforcement, I have seen first-hand the damage guns can cause. Firearms are used to kill tens of thousands of Americans each year.

    I feel we can balance these interests, protecting the rights of gun owners while at the same time keeping weapons of war out of civilian hands. It is time to take common sense steps to reduce gun violence. If we fail to act, nothing will change

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    My response...

    I strongly disagree. I can see now that your agenda tries to remove our constitutional rights. The agenda you follow still does not prevent crime and will not prevent "criminals" from getting firearms illegally. That is why they are criminals in the first place. If they followed the process that we law-abiding citizens follow, no criminals will get their hands on the firearms you describe or any firearms for that matter. Unfortunately, this common sense thinking does not seem to sink with you or your party.

    You're balancing effort actually just labels all of us law abiding citizens as criminals.
  • #2
    AAShooter
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • May 2010
    • 7188

    He has an open house this weekend. Stop by and give him your thoughts.

    Meet Congressman Swalwell at his Pleasanton office's open house.

    Saturday, February 2
    11:00 AM - 2:00 PM

    5075 Hopyard Rd, Suite 220
    Pleasanton, CA 94588

    Comment

    • #3
      high_revs
      Calguns Addict
      • Feb 2006
      • 7706

      I will do that! give me a reason to ride the duc. maybe he can complain motorcycles cause deaths too! LOL

      seriously, i'll be presentable. any other calgunners going?

      Comment

      • #4
        NikePenguin
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 524

        Originally posted by high_revs
        cut-n-paste from his email to me.

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Thank you for contacting me about gun safety. I always appreciate hearing from my constituents, and I am glad to receive your input on this important issue.

        I come from a family of hunters and gun owners. I know that guns can be used responsibly and the Second Amendment provides individuals certain rights to own firearms. However, as a former prosecutor whose father is a retired police officer and whose younger brother currently serves in law enforcement, I have seen first-hand the damage guns can cause. Firearms are used to kill tens of thousands of Americans each year.

        I feel we can balance these interests, protecting the rights of gun owners while at the same time keeping weapons of war out of civilian hands. It is time to take common sense steps to reduce gun violence. If we fail to act, nothing will change

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


        My response...

        I strongly disagree. I can see now that your agenda tries to remove our constitutional rights. The agenda you follow still does not prevent crime and will not prevent "criminals" from getting firearms illegally. That is why they are criminals in the first place. If they followed the process that we law-abiding citizens follow, no criminals will get their hands on the firearms you describe or any firearms for that matter. Unfortunately, this common sense thinking does not seem to sink with you or your party.

        You're balancing effort actually just labels all of us law abiding citizens as criminals.
        You forgot to mention that current laws ALREADY keep "weapons of war out of civilian hands." He is using empty rhetoric to disarm law-abiding citizens.
        Ruger MkII Target .22lr
        Glock 19 Gen2 - Glock 19 Gen3 - Glock 26 9mm
        Colt Python 6" - Ruger KGP141 .357
        Glock 33 357SIG - Sig Sauer P250SC .40/357SIG
        Glock 23 - Glock 27 .40
        Glock 20 - Glock 29SF 10mm
        Desert Eagle MkVII .44
        Sig Sauer P220 - Sig Sauer P227R - Sig Sauer 1911R - Glock 30SF - S.A. 1911 Mil Spec .45

        Comment

        • #5
          gwgn02
          Banned
          • Sep 2011
          • 3397

          Swallows is no better than the Socialist he replaced, Pete Stark

          Comment

          • #6
            Tank 57
            Veteran Member
            • Jul 2009
            • 4143

            Originally posted by gwgn02
            Swallows is no better than the Socialist he replaced, Pete Stark
            Yes,he is.Just by not being Pete Stark.

            Comment

            • #7
              AAShooter
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              CGN Contributor
              • May 2010
              • 7188

              Here is his press release on the new bill:

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1