WOULD BANNING FIREARMS REDUCE MURDER AND SUICIDE? A Study

[ewarmour]

International evidence and comparisons have long been offered
as proof of the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that
fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths.1 Unfortunately, such
discussions are all too often been afflicted by misconceptions and
factual error and focus on comparisons that are unrepresentative.
It may be useful to begin with a few examples. There is a compound
assertion that (a) guns are uniquely available in the United
States compared with other modern developed nations, which is
why (b) the United States has by far the highest murder rate.
Though these assertions have been endlessly repeated, statement
(b) is, in fact, false and statement (a) is substantially so.

See attached study.

[benjaminh98]

Its easy to argue with people who list the statistics of other countries.

Ask;
Who has stricter gun laws, Mexico or The United States? Which country is far more violent than the other?

[pigman]

BAN MURDER.

[The War Wagon]

[cowboykenny]

just lock up all mentally unstable people like they used to. Screw the ACLU its all their fault.

[Mullins]

Thanks for the read.

Downloading now to give to a few anti friends (who I just had a debate with today)

[RekEnhanced]

BAN MURDER.

That's what I've been saying! If we just ban murder then we can all keep our guns! Who's in guys?!?!?!?!

[myk]

Anti's and gun grabbers don't take into account that criminals and those intent on committing gun violence will ALWAYS have access to firearms. And they're also too f**king stupid to see that most guns used in crimes are obtained ILLEGALY, just like the death-ray-guns that were used in the school shooting last week...

[The Geologist]

No!!

The Sandy Hook Incident is an excellent example. Gun Free Zones = only the criminal will have the gun.