Progressivism and the 2nd Amendment?

[a1c]

This right is completely incompatible with Progressivism, because that philosophy holds that the good of the collective supersedes the needs of the individual. Its the Star Trek aphorism of "The needs of the Many, Outweigh the Needs of the One". How can the needs of the many supersede the needs of the one , when the one retains a right to lethal force against the collective?

Sometime in your life you need to talk to some progressive Israelis.

Your view of what you call "progressive" is some sort of weird oversimplified stereotype straight of a Glen Beck rant. It doesn't fit reality.

This thread belongs in OT anyway. This is typical crap that does NOTHING to advance our rights, it just polarizes gun owners and 2A supporters over political issues that have nothing to do with the RKBA.

You need to do some more reading. And maybe meet some more people who don't think exactly like you. What I see you describe as "progressives" doesn't fit a lot of people who could be defined or who identify as such.

[rjpsb1]

This thread belongs in OT anyway.

Yep.