Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Inherited a Marlin modle 57 22

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FairfaxCA
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 217

    Inherited a Marlin modle 57 22

    I inherited a Marlin 57 22 from my dad in Oregon he got it in 1960 and never registered it, what do I have to do to get it to California?
    Can I send it to my home in California while I'm here in Oregon?
    Thanks for any help.
  • #2
    FairfaxCA
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 217

    Anyone?

    Comment

    • #3
      Czsp-01-9mm
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 1853

      Here this might help
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        jpscoot_21
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 1186

        So, it looks to me...according to 18 USC 922 A(5); inheriting a long gun (as long as it's not AW) and driving it home or sending it to yourself is good to go.

        Comment

        • #5
          majtom94
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 1120

          It would be better to drive it home.
          "Do Democrats even realize that they are making more people buy more guns?"

          NRA Member
          NAGR Member
          CGF Member
          GOA Member

          Comment

          • #6
            The Gleam
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2011
            • 13742

            Originally posted by FairfaxCA
            I inherited a Marlin 57 22 from my dad in Oregon he got it in 1960 and never registered it, what do I have to do to get it to California?
            Can I send it to my home in California while I'm here in Oregon?
            Thanks for any help.
            And it's 50 years old or older; even if you had gotten it from another CA citizen, it would have been face-to-face without the need for dealer or DROS involvement (for now, anyway - ).

            Being separate states is another issue, but I think since it is father to son, it is not a problem either? I am quite sure there are enough threads or FAQs here on Calguns that the answer lies within multiple times, and can be found with minimum strain of a search. I know I've seen threads many times title the same as yours.
            -----------------------------------------------
            Originally posted by Librarian
            What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

            If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

            Comment

            • #7
              The Gleam
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2011
              • 13742

              Originally posted by majtom94
              It would be better to drive it home.
              Why not just fly with it? There is nothing illegal about flying with firearms in cargo so long as you declare with TSA or the cargo counter, do clearance check with them and get your orange tag, and lock it in an appropriate case. I've flown dozens of times with firearms and never an issue.

              It's actually BETTER, because depending on the airport, you often get removed from the general cattle-loading all purpose line to get to the secure bay-areas of the airport, and get to go through TSA's MUCH shorter check line. You'll often be the only person in line, and get treated like a king. Every time I've flown with firearms, it was an ADVANTAGE and ALWAYS a more pleasant experience than flying without firearms.
              -----------------------------------------------
              Originally posted by Librarian
              What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

              If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

              Comment

              • #8
                Quiet
                retired Goon
                • Mar 2007
                • 30242

                Originally posted by jpscoot_21
                So, it looks to me...according to 18 USC 922 A(5); inheriting a long gun (as long as it's not AW) and driving it home or sending it to yourself is good to go.
                Yes.
                But, keep in mind that the giver needs to be dead for this exemption to be valid.
                sigpic

                "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                Comment

                • #9
                  FairfaxCA
                  Member
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 217

                  Thanks for the answers guys.
                  I wasen't able to search the threads on my ipod for some reason.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1