Why are we then denied pistols / revolvers, because some imbecile states that they are unsafe ?
If the safe handling test ( written & then safely handled ) is passed - how is a pistol / revolver much too dangerous for a ca gunner to own ?
Am I missing something?
If the safe handling test ( written & then safely handled ) is passed - how is a pistol / revolver much too dangerous for a ca gunner to own ?
Am I missing something?


Comment