Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Using .40 mags for 9mm for more capacity illegal?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    DPC
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 845

    Looks like a ten round mag to me. I have had experience with leo and this matter.

    Comment

    • #17
      repubconserv
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 3056

      Originally posted by paul0660
      It doesn't say designed to. Have your ducks in a row if you have stuffed more than 10 nines in a .40 mag.
      I could also fit about 40 9mm rounds into my shotgun mag... 100 or more 22lr. into my shotgun mag...probably about 50 22lr into my 308 rifle mag... etc

      should I be worried? no. The mag is not designed for 9mm or 22lr.

      Comment

      • #18
        stix213
        AKA: Joe Censored
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Apr 2009
        • 19002

        Originally posted by paul0660
        It doesn't say designed to. Have your ducks in a row if you have stuffed more than 10 nines in a .40 mag.
        There is nothing illegal about possessing a large-capacity magazine though anyway. You can't sell, give, trade, manufacture, etc, but shoving more rounds than intended into a magazine doesn't mean you've done any of those illegal things.

        Comment

        • #19
          paul0660
          In Memoriam
          • Jul 2007
          • 15669

          I think designed is implied. Otherwise any 10rd magazine larger than .22 would be illegal.
          I could also fit about 40 9mm rounds into my shotgun mag... 100 or more 22lr. into my shotgun mag...probably about 50 22lr into my 308 rifle mag... etc


          should I be worried? no. The mag is not designed for 9mm or 22lr.
          Well that was a waste of breath on my part. I forgot about the comprehension thing.
          *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

          Comment

          • #20
            paul0660
            In Memoriam
            • Jul 2007
            • 15669

            Originally posted by stix213
            There is nothing illegal about possessing a large-capacity magazine though anyway. You can't sell, give, trade, manufacture, etc, but shoving more rounds than intended into a magazine doesn't mean you've done any of those illegal things.
            DUH.

            JHFC that is not the point.
            *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

            Comment

            • #21
              paul0660
              In Memoriam
              • Jul 2007
              • 15669

              Originally posted by DPC
              Looks like a ten round mag to me. I have had experience with leo and this matter.
              I would like to hear about that.


              Ducks in a row means if you possess a .40 mag for a gun that never existed before 2000, and have a bunch o' 9mm in there, you have a problem, because the law says capacity to, not designed to. You also have to remember to shut the heck up.

              Clear?
              *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

              Comment

              • #22
                Steve1968LS2
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Feb 2010
                • 9275

                So, I own pre-ban .40 Sigma mags..

                If I buy a new M&P 9mm then I could run those higher capacity mags?

                Interesting..
                Originally posted by tony270
                It's easy to be a keyboard warrior, you would melt like wax in front of me, you wouldn't be able to move your lips.
                Member: Patron member NRA, lifetime member SAF, CRPA

                Comment

                • #23
                  paul0660
                  In Memoriam
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 15669

                  Originally posted by Steve1968LS2
                  So, I own pre-ban .40 Sigma mags..

                  If I buy a new M&P 9mm then I could run those higher capacity mags?

                  Interesting..
                  I think so.
                  *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    CSACANNONEER
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 44094

                    Originally posted by paul0660
                    Well that was a waste of breath on my part. I forgot about the comprehension thing.
                    I don't see anything in the law which requires the magazine to function if more than 10 rounds are forced into it. Therefore, using you logic, any magazine capable of holding more than 10 .22lr rounds is illegal. Right? Or, did I miss the comprehension test?
                    NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor
                    California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller
                    Ventura County approved CCW Instructor
                    Utah CCW Instructor


                    Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners.

                    sigpic
                    CCW SAFE MEMBERSHIPS HERE

                    KM6WLV

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      paul0660
                      In Memoriam
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 15669

                      I miss the comprehension test?
                      I think so!

                      I think I cleared it up, but I have to go right now. Work this out.
                      *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        repubconserv
                        Veteran Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3056

                        Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                        I don't see anything in the law which requires the magazine to function if more than 10 rounds are forced into it. Therefore, using you logic, any magazine capable of holding more than 10 .22lr rounds is illegal. Right? Or, did I miss the comprehension test?
                        I think you missed his comprehension test.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Baconator
                          Bacon makes it better
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 9547

                          When I bought my first xd there was a post card inside that advised you too do just what you are asking, use the 40 mags in a 9mm for increased capacity. It isn't illegal to own large capacity magazines, so what could they possibly come after you for?

                          Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            paul0660
                            In Memoriam
                            • Jul 2007
                            • 15669

                            This is a great thread. I know that because I know I am right and also confused.

                            Now I am late for my meeting. Hasta.
                            *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              repubconserv
                              Veteran Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 3056

                              Originally posted by bwiese
                              Originally posted by Scottyoh530
                              Hey I had a couple questions about my .50 beowulf upper that I have attached to my spikes tactical lower (marked in .223/5.56 cal). I also use 30 round .223/5.56 magazines because it holds 10 .50 beowulf rounds(but the mags are marked .223/5.56). I also have ar-15's that are chambered in .223/5.56 that I usually store together and take to the range together. Is this in anyway illegal because my lower is marked .223/5.56 instead of multi-cal?
                              1. If your rifle has a Bullet Button I'd recommend that 50Beowulf mags have their markings
                                as such so there's no handwaving about having a hicap mag in a fixed mag rifle. (Yes, I
                                know the 50Beowulf upper should 'fix' things for the 5.56 mag but it smells better/reduces
                                confrontation.)
                                .
                              2. If you are using a 223 AR with BulletButton, you should not use a 50Beowulf mag in it.
                                .
                              3. Neither warning above applies to 'featureless' semiauto centerfire rifles which can legally
                                use detachable magazines.
                                .
                              4. Except for edgy (1) and (2) situations above, there is no law banning misuse of a magazine
                                such that the misapplication of the mag actually stuffs more than 10rds in it.
                                .
                              5. Every gun magazine made can be misapplied in another caliber, and a huge fraction of mags
                                in the marketplace would transition into operable hicaps holding over 10 rounds when smaller
                                caliber ammo (actually, case size not caliber) was loaded into them.

                                [It's quite common for some 10rd 40S&W/357Sig pistol mags that fit in "common frame 9/357/40"
                                pistols to work well when stuffed with 10+N rounds of 9mm ammo. You may or may not want to
                                bet your life on this setup without lots of testing, though.]
                                .
                              6. It is generally illegal for normal CA residents to acquire over-10rd 223/5.56 AR magazines.
                                .
                              7. It is legal for CA residents to acquire 10rd 50Beowulf AR magazines like any other 10rd or less
                                magazine. Wise counsel would be to order these w/floorplates marked with this caliber and that
                                your mailorder (if such) specifically requests "10rd 50Beowulf magazines".
                                .
                              8. It is perfectly legal for someone to make 10rd 50Beowulf mags from an assortment of typical mag
                                parts. Again, the caveat from #7 above applies - you should use floorplates nicely marked as
                                caliber "50Beowulf" (and not with an electric pencil). SOMEBODY NEEDS TO MAKE THESE. SOME

                                .
                              9. The above is good theory. In the real world, to make things easier on you (and perhaps CGF) it
                                might well be wise to have a 50Beowulf upper if you have a ton of 50Beowulf mags just so the
                                "smell test" is a bit easier

                              10. The 50Beowulf mag has to work properly and without problems or parts changes back&forth in the 50Beowulf for it to be legally misapplied in a higher capacity 5.56 application..


                              CGF will back legit nonhicap mag cases charged as hicaps. But don't make it too hard on us, okay?
                              That's why I wrote all the above detail (recipe?)

                              MFGR FOLKS: SOMEBODY NEEDS TO MAKE 50Beowulf MAG FLOORPLATES!!!
                              Taken from this thread
                              Last edited by repubconserv; 05-15-2012, 3:10 PM.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Tiberius
                                Senior Member
                                • Jun 2009
                                • 1160

                                Slightly off topic, but a post above mentions that if one finds a high-cap mag, it can be legally kept. This seems consistent with the law, which bans manufacturing or importing.

                                So if I understand it correctly, it isn't illegal to buy one, if a hypothetical high-cap magazine store opened up somewhere. The seller would have a big problem, but the buyers wouldn't (unless they were accessories). Similarly, I don't see any ban on inheriting standard-cap mags. In contrast, AWs specifically can't be passed along this way.

                                As always, the law is a funny thing.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1